...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Role of heart-rate variability in preoperative assessment of physiological reserves in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
【24h】

Role of heart-rate variability in preoperative assessment of physiological reserves in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

机译:心率变异性在腹部大手术患者术前评估生理储备中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Major abdominal surgery (MAS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of heart-rate variability (HRV) concerning development of postoperative complications in patients undergoing MAS. The secondary objectives were to identify the relationship of HRV and use of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and hospital length of stay (H-LOS). Patients and methods: Sixty-five patients scheduled for elective MAS were enrolled in a prospective, single-center, observational study. HRV was measured by spectral analysis (SA) preoperatively during orthostatic load. Patients were divided according to cardiac autonomic reactivity (CAR; n=23) and non-cardiac autonomic reactivity (NCAR; n=30). Results: The final analysis included 53 patients. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding type of surgery, use of minimally invasive techniques or epidural catheter, duration of surgery and anesthesia, or the amount of fluid administered intraoperatively. The NCAR group had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss than the CAR group (541.7±541.9 mL vs 269.6±174.3 mL, p <0.05). In the NCAR group, vasoactive drugs were used during anesthesia more frequently (n=21 vs n=4; p <0.001), and more patients had at least one postoperative complication compared to the CAR group (n=19 vs n=4; p <0.01). Furthermore, the NCAR group had more serious complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ Grade III n=6 vs n=0; p <0.05) and a greater number of complications than the CAR group (n=57 vs n=5; p <0.001). Significant differences were found for two specific subgroups of complications: hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs (NCAR: n=10 vs CAR: n=0; p <0.01) and ileus (NCAR: n=11 vs CAR: n=2; p <0.05). Moreover, significant differences were found in the ICU-LOS (NCAR: 5.7±3.5 days vs CAR: 2.6±0.7 days; p <0.0001) and H-LOS (NCAR: 12.2±5.6 days vs CAR: 7.2±1.7 days; p <0.0001). Conclusion: Preoperative HRV assessment during orthostatic load is objective and useful for identifying patients with low autonomic physiological reserves and high risk of poor post-operative course.
机译:背景:大型腹部手术(MAS)与发病率和死亡率增加相关。我们研究的主要目的是评估心率变异性(HRV)对MAS患者术后并发症发生的预测价值。次要目标是确定麻醉期间HRV与血管活性药物的使用,重症监护病房的住院天数(ICU-LOS)和医院住院天数(H-LOS)的关系。患者和方法:安排进行选择性MAS的65例患者参加了一项前瞻性,单中心,观察性研究。在体位负荷期间,术前通过频谱分析(SA)测量HRV。根据心脏自主反应性(CAR; n = 23)和非心脏自主反应性(NCAR; n = 30)对患者进行划分。结果:最终分析包括53例患者。在手术类型,微创技术或硬膜外导管的使用,手术和麻醉的持续时间或术中输注的液体量方面,两组之间没有观察到显着差异。 NCAR组的术中失血量明显大于CAR组(541.7±541.9 mL和269.6±174.3 mL,p <0.05)。在NCAR组中,麻醉期间更常使用血管活性药物(n = 21 vs n = 4; p <0.001),并且与CAR组相比,至少有一个术后并发症的患者更多(n = 19 vs n = 4; n = 4)。 p <0.01)。此外,与CAR组相比,NCAR组的并发症更为严重(Clavien-Dindo≥III级,n = 6 vs n = 0; p <0.05),并且并发症的发生率也高于CAR组(n = 57 vs n = 5; p <0.001 )。在两个特定的并发症亚组中发现了显着差异:需要血管活性药物的低血压(NCAR:n = 10 vs CAR:n = 0; p <0.01)和肠梗阻(NCAR:n = 11 vs CAR:n = 2; p <0.05 )。此外,在ICU-LOS(NCAR:5.7±3.5天vs CAR:2.6±0.7天; p <0.0001)和H-LOS(NCAR:12.2±5.6天vs CAR:7.2±1.7天; p <0.0001)。结论:体位负荷期间的术前HRV评估是客观的,有助于识别自主神经生理储备低,术后病程风险高的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号