首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Evaluation of costs accrued through inadvertent continuation of hospital-initiated proton pump inhibitor therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge: a retrospective chart?review
【24h】

Evaluation of costs accrued through inadvertent continuation of hospital-initiated proton pump inhibitor therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge: a retrospective chart?review

机译:通过回顾性图表回顾性评估因无​​意间继续使用医院启动的质子泵抑制剂治疗而导致的出院后应激性溃疡预防所产生的费用:

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Stress ulcers and related upper gastrointestinal bleeding are well-known complications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has been widely prescribed in noncritically ill patients who are at low risk for clinically significant bleeding, which is then injudiciously continued after hospital discharge. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of inappropriate prescribing of PPI-based preventative therapy in ICU versus non-ICU patients that subsequently continued postdischarge, and to estimate the costs incurred by the unwarranted outpatient continuation of PPI therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of patient data at a major teaching hospital in Korea was performed. During the 4-year study period, adult patients who were newly initiated on PPI-based SUP during hospital admission and subsequently discharged on a PPI without a medical indication for such therapy were captured for data analysis. The incidence rates of inappropriate prescribing of PPIs were compared between ICU and non-ICU patients, and the costs associated with such therapy were also examined. Results: A total of 4,410 patients, more than half of the inpatient-initiated PPI users, were deemed to have been inadvertently prescribed a PPI at discharge in the absence of a medical need for acid suppression. The incidence of inappropriate outpatient continuation of the prophylaxis was higher among ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (57.7% versus 52.2%, respectively; P =0.001). The total expenditure accrued through the continuation of nonindicated PPI therapy was approximately US$40,175. Conclusion: This study confirmed that excess usage of PPIs for SUP has spread to low-risk, non-ICU patients. The overuse of unwarranted PPI therapy can incur large health care expenditure, as well as clinical complications with minimal therapeutic benefits. Educating clinicians regarding SUP guidelines and the adverse effects of long-term use of acid suppression can improve the cost effectiveness of PPI therapy.
机译:背景:应激性溃疡和相关的上消化道出血是重症监护病房(ICU)患者的众所周知的并发症。基于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的应激性溃疡预防(SUP)已被广泛开用于非严重疾病的患者,这些患者的临床显着出血风险较低,然后在出院后继续进行这种治疗是不明智的。这项研究的目的是评估ICU与非ICU患者随后继续出院后基于PPI预防性治疗处方不当的发生率,并估算无理由的门诊继续进行PPI治疗所产生的费用。方法:对韩国一家大型教学医院的患者数据进行回顾性审查。在为期4年的研究期内,捕获了在住院期间刚开始使用基于PPI的SUP并随后因无医学指征而接受PPI出院的成年患者,以进行数据分析。比较了ICU和非ICU患者PPI处方不当的发生率,并检查了与此类治疗相关的费用。结果:总共有4,410名患者,占住院病人发起的PPI使用者的一半以上,被认为在出院时无意地服用了PPI,而没有医疗上需要抑制酸的使用。与非ICU患者相比,ICU患者中不适当的门诊继续预防的发生率更高(分别为57.7%和52.2%; P = 0.001)。继续进行非指示性PPI治疗所产生的总支出约为40,175美元。结论:这项研究证实,过度使用SPI的PPI已蔓延至低风险的非ICU患者。过度使用无用的PPI治疗可能会导致大量医疗保健支出,以及临床并发症,从而使治疗获益最小。对临床医生进行有关SUP指南和长期使用抑酸剂的不良影响的教育可以提高PPI治疗的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号