...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Does nonadherence to local recommendations for empirical antibiotic therapy on admission to the intensive care unit have an impact on in-hospital mortality?
【24h】

Does nonadherence to local recommendations for empirical antibiotic therapy on admission to the intensive care unit have an impact on in-hospital mortality?

机译:重症监护病房入院时不遵守当地推荐的经验性抗生素治疗的建议是否会影响住院死亡率?

获取原文

摘要

Objective: 1/ To evaluate if empirical antibiotic prescription on admission to our intensive care unit (ICU) respects the local recommendations for antibiotic prescription and to identify predictors of nonadherence to these guidelines. 2/ To assess whether nonadherence to the guidelines is associated with increased in-hospital mortality due to the initial infection. Materials and methods: This was a prospective six-month observational study performed in a 14-bed medical ICU. Patients were included if they received curative antibiotic therapy on admission. Respect of the local treatment recommendations was evaluated according to adherence to the local empirical guidelines defined in a 80-page booklet which is given in our hospital to every physician. Results: Among 132 antibiotic prescriptions, 21 (16%) were unjustified (absence of infection), 17 (13%) were microbiologically documented at admission, and nine (7%) were given for infections from unknown origin. Among the 85 (64%) empirical prescriptions that could be evaluated for adherence to local recommendations, nine (11%) were inappropriate and 76 (89%) appropriate. In univariate analysis hospital-acquired infection was the sole predictor of inappropriate treatment (p = 0.0475). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality due to the initial infection were inappropriate empirical treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 14.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17–98.97; p = 0.006), prescription of fluoroquinolones (OR = 8.22, 95% CI: 1.88–35.95; p = 0.005) and a higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score (per one-point increment (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Nonadherence to local empirical antibiotic therapy guidelines was associated with increased in-hospital mortality due to the initial infection.
机译:目的:1 /评估进入我们的重症监护室(ICU)时的经验性抗生素处方是否尊重当地的抗生素处方建议,并确定不遵守这些指南的预测因素。 2 /评估不遵守该准则是否与最初感染引起的院内死亡率增加有关。材料和方法:这是在14张病床的ICU中进行的为期六个月的前瞻性观察性研究。如果患者在入院时接受了治愈性抗生素治疗,则将其包括在内。根据对当地经验指南的评估,评估遵循80页手册中定义的当地经验指南,该手册在我们医院分发给每位医生。结果:在132份抗生素处方中,有21份(16%)是不合理的(无感染),入院时有微生物学记录的有17份(13%),有9份(7%)用于未知来源的感染。在可以评估是否符合当地建议的85种(64%)经验性处方中,有9种(11%)不合适,有76种(89%)合适。在单因素分析中,医院获得性感染是不适当治疗的唯一预测因素(p = 0.0475)。初始感染导致院内死亡的独立预测因素是不合适的经验治疗(赔率[OR] = 14.64,95%置信区间[CI]:2.17-98.97; p = 0.006),氟喹诺酮类药物的处方(OR = 8.22, 95%CI:1.88–35.95; p = 0.005)和更高的简化急性生理学评分II评分(每增加1分(OR = 1.04,95%CI:1.01–1.07; p = 0.02)。结论:不坚持局部治疗经验性抗生素治疗指南与最初感染引起的院内死亡率增加相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号