首页> 外文期刊>The Professional Medical Journal >Comparison of intra-articular injection therapy to physiotherapy techniques in management of shoulder impingement syndrome.
【24h】

Comparison of intra-articular injection therapy to physiotherapy techniques in management of shoulder impingement syndrome.

机译:关节内注射疗法与理疗技术在肩部撞击综合征治疗中的比较。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Shoulder impingement syndrome is umbrella term that covers rotator cuffsyndrome, tendinitis of muscles of rotator cuff and bursitis in shoulder region. Usually thissyndrome is treated conservatively. The treatment options are corticosteroid injections, medicaltreatment and physical therapy, of which, the most common are injection therapy and physicaltherapy. Injection therapy is carried out by orthopedic surgeons. However, which treatment ismost effective in terms of symptoms relieving and cost effectiveness, yet conflicting. StudyDesign: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Independent University Hospital, Faisalabad.Period: 1stJuly 2017 to 30thJune 2018. Materials and Methods: Comparing effects of twotreatments for shoulder impingement syndrome; sub armorial steroid injection, the controlgroup and manual physical therapy, the treatment group. Primary outcomes were ShoulderPain and Disability Index (SPADI), to measure endpoint differences. Secondary outcomesincluded changes in Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale and Numeric Pain Rating Scale(NPRS) scores. Trial was conducted in one clinical setup. The collected data was analyzed byStatistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS 20.00). Results: At baseline of group physicaltherapy 19(95%) reported severe and 1(5%) moderate level of pain, at numeric rating pain scale.At post treatment of group injection therapy 19(95%) reported severe and 1(5%) moderate levelof pain, at numeric rating pain scale. At follow up of group injection therapy 19(95%) reportedsevere and 1(5%) moderate level of pain, at numeric rating pain scale. At follow up of treatmentphysical therapy all patients mild level of pain, at numeric rating pain scale. Conclusion:Injection therapy treatment is more effective in improving shoulder impingement syndrome interms of pain and function than that of physical therapy treatment.
机译:肩部撞击综合征是笼统术语,涵盖肩袖综合征,肩袖肌肉腱炎和肩部滑囊炎。通常,该综合征要保守治疗。治疗选择是皮质类固醇注射,药物治疗和物理疗法,其中最常见的是注射疗法和物理疗法。整形外科医师进行注射疗法。但是,就缓解症状和降低成本效益而言,哪种治疗方法最有效,但却相互矛盾。 StudyDesign:随机对照试验。地点:费萨拉巴德独立大学医院。时间:2017年7月1日至2018年6月30日。材料与方法:比较两种治疗肩部撞击综合征的方法的效果;亚甲类固醇注射,对照组和人工物理疗法,治疗组。主要结局为肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI),以衡量终点差异。次要结果包括全球变化评分(GRC)量表和数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)得分的变化。在一种临床设置中进行了试验。通过社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 20.00)对收集的数据进行分析。结果:在组物理治疗的基线时,按数字评分疼痛量表,有19%(95%)报告严重和1%(5%)的疼痛;在组注射治疗后,有19%(95%)报告为严重和1%(5%) )中度疼痛,以数字评分的疼痛量表。在组注射疗法的随访中,有19%(95%)的严重程度和1(5%)的中度疼痛程度,以数字评分的疼痛量表表示。在进行物理治疗的随访中,所有患者的疼痛程度均以数字量表的疼痛等级表示。结论:注射疗法比物理疗法更有效地改善肩膀撞击综合征的疼痛和功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号