...
首页> 外文期刊>The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal >Design Efficiency Analysis Towards Product Improvement for Eco-Friendly Using DFMA Method
【24h】

Design Efficiency Analysis Towards Product Improvement for Eco-Friendly Using DFMA Method

机译:使用DFMA方法进行产品改进以实现生态友好的设计效率分析

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper presents the comparative study of design efficiency of two different brands of products, performing the same function using the Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) method. The study aims to compare the products on the relative design efficiency. The DFMA method was used as it is a well-established technique for improving the efficiency of the product leading to minimizing production costs. It also shortens product development time by reducing the number of components in a product. The study used two different brands of dry iron as a case study. The result shows that the percentage of the design efficiency of dry iron A is 8.82%, whereas it is 10.34% of dry iron B. Thus, the dry iron B is much better as compared to A in term of its assembly operation and design efficiency. Therefore, the dry iron B is greener than dry iron A. Furthermore, a redesign of dry iron B was proposed and analyzed for the internal validation. The DFMA analysis result shows that the percentage of design efficiency of a new conceptual design of dry iron B increased to 18.08%. The application of the DFMA method to enhance the eco-friendliness of a product has been proven to be highly useful in design work.
机译:本文介绍了两种不同品牌产品的设计效率的比较研究,使用制造和装配设计(DFMA)方法执行相同的功能。该研究旨在比较产品的相对设计效率。之所以使用DFMA方法,是因为它是一种完善的技术,可以提高产品效率,从而将生产成本降至最低。它还通过减少产品中的组件数量来缩短产品开发时间。该研究以两个不同品牌的干铁为例。结果表明,干铁A的设计效率百分比为8.82%,而干铁B的设计效率百分比为10.34%。因此,就组装操作和设计效率而言,干铁B优于A。 。因此,干铁B比干铁A更环保。此外,对干铁B进行了重新设计,并进行了内部验证。 DFMA分析结果表明,新概念设计的干铁B的设计效率百分比提高到18.08%。事实证明,使用DFMA方法增强产品的生态友好性在设计工作中非常有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号