This article reviews the safety and efficacy of ibutilide for use in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter. Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is primarily used for conversi'/> Safety and Efficacy of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice >Safety and Efficacy of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of Ibutilide in Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation

机译:伊布利特在心房扑动和心律失常电复律中的安全性和有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

id="p1">This article reviews the safety and efficacy of ibutilide for use in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter. Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, is primarily used for conversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation and is a good alternative to electrical cardioversion. Ibutilide has a conversion rate of up to 75% to 80% in recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter; the conversion rate is higher for atrial flutter than for atrial fibrillation. It is also safe in the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation/flutter among patients receiving oral amiodarone therapy. Ibutilide pretreatment facilitates transthoracic defibrillation and decreases the energy requirement of electrical cardioversion by both monophasic and biphasic shocks. Pretreatment with ibutilide before electrical defibrillation has a conversion rate of 100% compared with 72% with no pretreatment. Ibutilide is also safe and efficient in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients who have had cardiac surgery, and in accessory pathway–mediated atrial fibrillation where the conversion rate of ibutilide is as high as 95%. There is up to a 4% risk of torsade de pointes and a 4.9% risk of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Hence, close monitoring in an intensive care unit setting is warranted during and at least for 4 hours after drug infusion. The anticoagulation strategy is the same as for any other mode of cardioversion. class="kwd-group KWD">
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Antiarrhythmics&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Antiarrhythmics
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Arrhythmia&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Arrhythmia
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Atrial+Fibrillation&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Atrial Fibrillation
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Cardiovascular+Disorders&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Cardiovascular Disorders
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Cardioversion&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Cardioversion
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Drug+Therapy&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Drug Therapy
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Ibutilide&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Ibutilide
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=Patient+Safety&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">Patient Safety
  • >class="kwd-search" href="/search?fulltext=QT+Prolongation&sortspec=date&submit=Submit&andorexactfulltext=phrase">QT Prolongation id="p-2">In selected patient populations, cardioversion still remains the preferred management for atrial fibrillation and flutter, even though data suggest no survival advantage for rhythm control over rate control.id="xref-ref-1-1" class="xref-bibr" href="#ref-1">1 Electrical cardioversion has been the most widely used and the most effective method to restore sinus rhythm in these atrial arrhythmias. However, chemical cardioversion is a good alternative for use in certain patient groups. Chemical cardioversion is less invasive, more cost-effective, and, unlike electrical cardioversion, it does not require sedation.id="xref-ref-2-1" class="xref-bibr" href="#ref-2">2–4 The various drugs commonly used for pharmacologic cardioversion are ibutilide, procainamide, propafenone, flecanide, amiodarone, and dofetilide. Among these drugs, ibutilide, dofetilide, flecanide, and propafenone have class I (level of evidence A) indication for their use in pharmacologic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.id="xref-ref-5-1" class="xref-bibr" href="#ref-5">5 This corresponds to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) level 1 recommendation. Amiodarone has class IIa (SORT level 2 recommendation), whereas procainamide and quinidine have class IIb (SORT level 3 recommendation) indication for their use in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.id="xref-ref-5-2" class="xref-bibr" href="#ref-5">5 Digoxin and sotalol do not have proven efficacy when used for this purpose.id="xref-ref-5-3" class="xref-bibr" href="#ref-5">5 id="p-3">Ibutilide—despite its efficacy, which is comparable or superior to other agents—is not widely used, mainly because of physician's lack of awareness about its safety and efficacy profile. This article reviews the safety and efficacy data of ibutilide
  • 机译:id =“ p1”>本文回顾了依布利特用于房颤和扑动患者的安全性和有效性。伊布利利特是一种III类抗心律不齐药,主要用于心房扑动和原纤化的转化,是电复律的良好替代品。在最近发生的房颤和扑动中,依布利特的转化率高达75%至80%。心房扑动的转化率高于房颤。在接受口服胺碘酮治疗的患者中,慢性心房颤动/扑动的转换也很安全。伊布利特预处理可促进经胸除颤,并通过单相和双相电击降低电复律的能量需求。电除颤之前使用依布利特进行的预处理的转化率为100%,而未进行预处理的转化率为72%。在进行过心脏手术的患者以及在辅助途径介导的心房纤颤中,依布利特的转化率高达95%,在治疗房颤方面也是安全有效的。发生尖端扭转型室速的风险高达4%,发生单形性室性心动过速的风险高达4.9%。因此,有必要在药物输注期间和之后至少4小时对重症监护病房进行严密监视。抗凝策略与其他任何心脏复律模式相同。 class =“ kwd-group KWD”>
  • > class =“ kwd-search” href =“ / search?fulltext = Antiarrhythmics&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>抗心律失常药物
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search?fulltext = Arrhythmia&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>心律失常
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search?fulltext =心房颤动&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>房颤
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search?fulltext =心血管疾病> sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>心血管疾病
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search ?fulltext = Cardioversion&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“> Cardioversion
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search ?fulltext =药物+疗法&sortspec =日期&submi t = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>药物治疗
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search?fulltext = Ibutilide&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“> Ibutilide
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search?fulltext = Patient + Safety&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“>患者安全
  • > class =” kwd-search“ href =” / search? fulltext = QT + Prolongation&sortspec = date&submit = Submit&andorexactfulltext = phrase“> QT延长 id =” p-2“>在选定的患者人群中,心脏复律仍然是即使数据表明节律控制对速率控制没有生存优势,心房纤颤和扑动仍是首选治疗方法。 id =“ xref-ref-1-1” class =“ xref-bibr” href =“#ref -1“> 1 电复律是恢复这些房性心律不齐的窦性心律最广泛,最有效的方法。但是,化学复律是在某些患者组中使用的很好的选择。化学电复律的侵入性较小,更具成本效益,并且与电电复律不同,它不需要镇静剂。 id =“ xref-ref-2-1” class =“ xref-bibr” href =“# ref-2“> 2–4 常用的药物复律药物包括伊布利特,普鲁卡因酰胺,普罗帕酮,氟哌啶胺,胺碘酮和多非利特。在这些药物中,依布利特,多非利特,氟卡尼和普罗帕酮具有I级(证据级别A)的适应症,可用于房颤的药物复律。 id =“ xref-ref-5-1” class = “ xref-bibr” href =“#ref-5”> 5 这对应于推荐分类标准强度(SORT)1级推荐。胺碘酮具有IIa类(推荐为SORT 2级推荐),普鲁卡因酰胺和奎尼丁具有IIb类(推荐为SORT 3级)适合于心脏房颤的心脏复律。 id =“ xref-ref-5-2” class =“ xref-bibr” href =“#ref-5”> 5 地高辛和索他洛尔在用于此目的时尚未证明有效。 id =“ xref-ref -5-3“ class =” xref-bibr“ href =”#ref-5“> 5 id =” p-3“>伊布利特-尽管具有疗效,与其他药物相当或优于其他药物的药物并未得到广泛使用,这主要是因为医师对其安全性和功效概况缺乏了解。本文回顾了伊布利特的安全性和有效性数据
  • 著录项

    相似文献

    • 外文文献
    • 中文文献
    • 专利
    获取原文

    客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

    京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
    • 客服微信

    • 服务号