...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Global Health >Cost and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits: findings from the Newhints cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Ghana
【24h】

Cost and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits: findings from the Newhints cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Ghana

机译:新生儿家访的成本和成本效益:来自加纳农村的Newhints整群随机对照试验的结果

获取原文

摘要

Summary BackgroundEvery year, 2·9 million newborn babies die worldwide. A meta-analysis of four cluster-randomised controlled trials estimated that home visits by trained community members in programme settings in Ghana and south Asia reduced neonatal mortality by 12% (95% CI 5–18). We aimed to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits in a programme setting.MethodsWe prospectively collected detailed cost data alongside the Newhints trial, which tested the effect of a home-visits intervention in seven districts in rural Ghana and showed a reduction of 8% (95% CI ?12 to 25%) in neonatal mortality. The intervention consisted of a package of home visits to pregnant women and their babies in the first week of life by community-based surveillance volunteers. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with Monte Carlo simulation and one-way sensitivity analyses and characterised uncertainty with cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. We then modelled the potential cost-effectiveness for baseline neonatal mortality rates of 20–60 deaths per 1000 livebirths with use of a meta-analysis of effectiveness estimates.FindingsIn the 49 zones randomly allocated to receive the Newhints intervention, a mean of 407 (SD 18) community-based surveillance volunteers undertook home visits for 7848 pregnant women who gave birth to 7786 live babies in 2009. Annual economic cost of implementation was US$203?998, or $0·53 per person. In the base-case analysis, the Newhints intervention cost a mean of $10?343 (95% CI 2963 to ?7674) per newborn life saved, or $352 (95% CI 104 to ?268) per discounted life-year saved, and had a 72% chance of being highly cost effective with respect to Ghana's 2009 gross domestic product per person. Key determinants of cost-effectiveness were the discount rate, protective effectiveness, baseline neonatal mortality rate, and implementation costs. In the scenarios modelled with the meta-analysis results, the ICER increased from $127 per life-year saved at a neonatal mortality rate of 60 deaths per 1000 livebirths, to $379 per life-year saved at a rate of 20 deaths per 1000 livebirths. The strategy had at least a 99% probability of being highly cost effective for lower-middle-income countries in all neonatal mortality rate scenarios modelled, and at least a 95% probability of being highly cost effective for low-income countries at neonatal mortality rates of 30 or more deaths per 1000 livebirths.InterpretationOur findings show that the seemingly modest mortality reductions achieved by a newborn home-visit strategy might in fact be cost effective. In Ghana, such strategies are also likely to be affordable. Our findings support recommendations from WHO and UNICEF that low-income and middle-income countries implement newborn home visits.FundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Department for International Development, WHO. prs.rt("abs_end"); Introduction Every year, 2·9 million newborn babies die worldwide; 98% of these deaths are in low-income or middle-income countries. 1 Existing interventions and care practices could prevent most of these deaths. 2 Saving newborn lives thus presents a health-systems challenge requiring cost-effective strategies to connect babies with the care and interventions proven to protect and restore their health. Four initial proof-of-principle 3 studies in south Asia showed that training of lay community health workers to do three home visits in the first week of life to promote essential newborn care practices and identify and refer or treat sick babies could reduce neonatal mortality by up to 60%. 4 , 5 , 6 and 7 These studies contributed to the decision by WHO and UNICEF to issue a joint statement in 2009 exhorting all low-income and middle-income countries to implement a home-visit strategy for newborns. 8 However, in 2013, a meta-analysis of four more recent cluster-randomised controlled trials estimated a more modest 12% (95% CI 5–18) reduction in the neonatal mortality rate in programme settings. 3 One of the four more recent trials—Newhints—was done on a large scale in rural Ghana in 2007–09 ( appendix ) and estimated an 8% (95% CI ?12 to 25; p=0·405) reduction in neonatal mortality rate. 3 Since 2000, Ghana has been scaling up the community-based health planning and services initiative. 9 This scale-up involved a cadre of salaried nurses deployed as community health officers who were supported by village health committees and unpaid community-based surveillance volunteers. 10 and 11 There was no minimum education requirement for community-based surveillance volunteers, whose role focused on birth and death registration and disease surveillance. 10 and 11 Newhints built on this existing group of community-based surveillance volunteers by providing them with additional training and superv
机译:发明背景每年全世界有2·900万新生婴儿死亡。对四个集群随机对照试验的荟萃分析估计,在加纳和南亚的项目环境中,受过训练的社区成员进行的家访减少了12%的新生儿死亡率(95%CI 5-18)。我们的目标是在计划背景下评估新生儿家访的费用和成本效益。方法我们与Newhints试验一起前瞻性地收集了详细的费用数据,该试验测试了加纳农村地区7个地区的家访干预措施的效果,并显示出减少的效果新生儿死亡率为8%(95%CI≥12至25%)。干预措施包括以社区为基础的监测志愿者在出生后第一周对孕妇及其婴儿进行一次家庭访问。我们使用蒙特卡洛模拟和单向敏感性分析计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),并通过成本效益平面和成本效益可接受性曲线来表征不确定性。然后,我们使用有效性估算值的荟萃分析,对每1000例婴儿中20–60例死亡的基准新生儿死亡率的潜在成本效益进行了建模。发现在随机分配接受Newhints干预措施的49个区域中,平均值为407(SD 18)社区监督志愿者在2009年对7848例孕妇进行了家访,这些孕妇生下了7786例活产婴儿。实施的年经济成本为203-998美元,或每人0·53美元。在基本案例分析中,Newhints干预措施每挽救一个新生儿的平均费用为10?343美元(95%CI 2963至?7674),或每折算生命年平均为352美元(95%CI 104至268%),以及就加纳2009年人均国内生产总值而言,具有72%的机会具有很高的成本效益。决定成本效益的关键因素是折现率,保护效果,基线新生儿死亡率和实施成本。在以荟萃分析结果为模型的情景中,ICER从以每千名生命中的60人死亡的新生儿死亡率保存的每生命年127美元增加到以每千名生命中的20死亡率保存的每生命年379美元的费用。在模拟的所有新生儿死亡率情景中,该策略至少有99%的可能性对中低收入国家具有高成本效益,而在新生儿死亡率下,至少有95%的可能性对中低收入国家具有较高成本效益每1000例婴儿中有30例或30例以上的死亡。解释我们的研究结果表明,通过新生儿在家看望策略所实现的看似适度的死亡率降低实际上可能具有成本效益。在加纳,这种战略也很可能负担得起。我们的研究结果支持了WHO和UNICEF关于低收入和中等收入国家实施新生儿家访的建议。资助世界卫生组织英国国际发展部比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会。 prs.rt(“ abs_end”);引言全世界每年有2·900万新生婴儿死亡。这些死亡中有98%在低收入或中等收入国家中。 1 现有的干预措施和护理措施可以预防大多数此类死亡。 2 因此,挽救新生儿的生命提出了一项卫生系统挑战,要求采用经济有效的策略使婴儿与经过证明可以保护和恢复健康的护理和干预措施联系起来。在南亚进行的四项初始原理证明 3 研究表明,对非专业社区卫生工作者进行培训,使其在他们出生后的第一周内进行三次家访,以促进基本的新生儿护理实践以及确定和推荐或治疗生病的婴儿最多可将新生儿死亡率降低60%。 4、5、6和7 这些研究有助于WHO和UNICEF于2009年发布联合声明,敦促所有低收入和中等收入人群-收入国家实施新生儿探亲策略。 8 但是,在2013年,对四项最近的整群随机对照试验的荟萃分析估计,在程序设置中,新生儿死亡率降低了12%(95%CI 5-18)。 3 最近的四个试验之一-Newhints-在2007–09年度在加纳农村进行了大规模试验(附录),估计为8%(95%CI≥12至25; p = 0·405)降低新生儿死亡率。 3 自2000年以来,加纳一直在扩大基于社区的健康计划和服务计划。 9 此次扩大规模包括部署有薪水护士队伍的社区卫生官员,他们得到了村卫生委员会和无薪社区监督志愿者的支持。 10和11 对于以监视出生和死亡登记以及疾病监视为角色的社区监视志愿者,没有最低教育要求。 10和11 Newhints通过为现有的社区监视志愿者组提供更多信息培训与督导

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号