首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Reproduction and Development >A Comparison of Cryotop and Solid Surface Vitrification Methods for the Cryopreservation of In Vitro Matured Bovine Oocytes
【24h】

A Comparison of Cryotop and Solid Surface Vitrification Methods for the Cryopreservation of In Vitro Matured Bovine Oocytes

机译:冷冻成熟的体外卵母细胞冷冻保存和冷冻表面固化方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of the cooling systems of the solid surface (SSV) and Cryotop vitrification methods for cryopreservation of bovine oocytes at the metaphase II stage. The effects of vitrification on oocyte viability, in vitro fertilization (IVF), pronucleus formation and subsequent in vitro development were assessed. In vitro matured (IVM) bovine oocytes were subjected to equilibration and vitrification solutions according to the SSV method, and then the oocytes were vitrified either by dropping onto a cold dry metal surface (SSV group) or by plunging into liquid nitrogen on Cryotop sheets (Cryotop group). Warming was conducted according to the SSV method. Some oocytes were subjected to the cryoprotectants and warming regimen without cooling (Solution control group). The live/dead status of oocytes was evaluated by fluorescein diacetate staining. Live oocytes were subjected to IVF, and the resultant embryos were cultured in vitro . The rates of live oocytes were similar among the Fresh control, Solution control, SSV and Cryotop groups. There was no difference in the rates of fertilization, pronuclear formation and monospermy among these groups. The cleavage rates in the SSV and Cryotop groups (41.6 and 53.2%, respectively) were significantly lower than those in the Fresh control and Solution control groups (65.9 and 61.3%, respectively). The blastocyst rates in SSV and Cryotop groups did not differ (10.3 and 12.8%, respectively); however, they were significantly lower than those in the Fresh control and Solution control groups (36.4 and 24.8%, respectively). The inner cell mass, trophectoderm and total cell numbers in blastocysts did not differ significantly among the Fresh control, Solution control, SSV and Cryotop groups. Our results indicate that IVM bovine oocytes could be cryopreserved successfully using the cooling systems of the Cryotop and Solid Surface Vitrification methods with similar efficacy.
机译:本研究的目的是比较固态表面冷却系统(SSV)和Cryotop玻璃化方法在中期II期冷冻保存卵母细胞的效率。评估了玻璃化对卵母细胞生存力,体外受精(IVF),原核形成和随后体外发育的影响。根据SSV方法,对体外成熟的(IVM)牛卵母细胞进行平衡和玻璃化溶液处理,然后将卵母细胞滴入冷干金属表面(SSV组)或浸入Cryotop板的液氮中进行玻璃化( Cryotop组)。根据SSV方法进行加热。一些卵母细胞在没有冷却的情况下接受了冷冻保护剂和加温方案(溶液对照组)。通过荧光素二乙酸酯染色评估卵母细胞的活/死状态。对活卵母细胞进行IVF,并在体外培养所得的胚胎。在新鲜对照组,溶液对照组,SSV和Cryotop组中,活卵母细胞的比率相似。这些组之间的受精率,前核形成率和单精子率没有差异。 SSV和Cryotop组的裂解率(分别为41.6和53.2%)显着低于Fresh对照组和Solution对照组的裂解率(分别为65.9和61.3%)。 SSV组和Cryotop组的囊胚率没有差异(分别为10.3和12.8%)。但是,它们显着低于新鲜对照组和溶液对照组(分别为36.4和24.8%)。在新鲜对照组,溶液对照组,SSV和Cryotop组之间,囊胚的内部细胞质量,滋养外胚层和总细胞数没有显着差异。我们的结果表明,使用冰冻冷冻和固体表面玻璃化方法的冷却系统可以将IVM牛卵母细胞成功冷冻保存,效果相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号