...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Comparing Off-Pump and On-Pump Clinical Outcomes and Costs for Diabetic Cardiac Surgery?Patients
【24h】

Comparing Off-Pump and On-Pump Clinical Outcomes and Costs for Diabetic Cardiac Surgery?Patients

机译:比较糖尿病心脏外科手术的非体外循环和体外循环临床结果和费用?

获取原文
           

摘要

DiscussionReferencesObservational studies have documented an off-pump over on-pump advantage for high-risk patients, including diabetic patients. Randomized trials have not confirmed this advantage. The VA Randomization On Versus Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial randomly assigned 2,203 coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients at 18 sites to either on-pump (n?= 1,099) or off-pump (n?= 1,104) procedures. An a priori ROOBY aim was to evaluate treatment impact on diabetic patients.MethodsActively treated diabetic patients (n?= 835, receiving oral hypoglycemic or insulin medications) received off-pump CABG (n?= 402) or on-pump CABG (n?= 433). The primary ROOBY trial endpoints were a short-term composite (30-day operative death or major complications) and a 1-year composite (death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization). Secondary ROOBY endpoints included 1-year all-cause death, 1-year graft patency, 1-year changes from baseline in neurocognitive status and health-related quality of life, and costs.ResultsDiabetic patients' risk factors at baseline were balanced across treatments. For diabetic patients, the primary short-term composite outcome rate showed a worse trend for off-pump (8.0%) than on-pump (3.9%, p?= 0.013), with no difference in the 1-year primary composite outcome or 1-year death rate. One-year patency was 83.1% off-pump versus 88.4% on-pump (p?= 0.004). No differences were found in neurocognitive, health-related quality of life, discharge cost, and 1-year cumulative cost.ConclusionsConcordant with the ROOBY trial's overall findings, off-pump CABG yielded no advantage over on-pump CABG for actively treated diabetic patients. The 1-year graft patency was lower and the short-term composite trended higher for off-pump CABG, with no other significant outcome or cost differences.CTSNet classification:23Dr Almassi discloses a financial relationship with Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim; and Dr Ebrahimi with Bristol Myers, Pfizer, Amarin, Astra Zeneca, The Medicines Company, Boehringer, Ingelheim, and Sanofi Aventis.The debate continues as to the relative benefit of performing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with an off-pump technique as opposed to traditional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass (on pump) and cardioplegic arrest of the heart [
机译:讨论参考文献观察性研究表明,对于包括糖尿病患者在内的高风险患者而言,非常规泵优于常规泵的优势。随机试验尚未证实这种优势。 VA对旁路搭桥随机试验(ROOBY)试验在18个地点随机分配了2203例冠状动脉旁路移植手术(CABG)患者,采用泵上(n?= 1,099)或泵外(n?= 1,104)程序。 ROOBY的一个先验目标是评估治疗对糖尿病患者的影响。方法积极治疗的糖尿病患者(n = 835,接受口服降糖或胰岛素药物治疗)接受非泵CABG(n = 402)或泵上CABG(n?)。 = 433)。 ROOBY试验的主要终点是短期综合指标(30天手术死亡或重大并发症)和1年综合指标(死亡,非致命性急性心肌梗塞或重复血运重建)。 ROOBY的次要终点包括1年全因死亡,1年移植物通畅,神经认知状态与健康相关的生活质量和成本较基线水平发生1年变化。结果糖尿病患者在基线时的危险因素在所有治疗中均得到平衡。对于糖尿病患者,主要的短期综合结局发生率(8.0%)要比进行中的(3.9%,p?= 0.013)要差,而一年期的主要综合结局或1年死亡率。一年的通畅率是83.1%,而非88.4%(p?= 0.004)。在神经认知,健康相关的生活质量,出院费用和1年累计费用方面没有发现差异。结论与ROOBY试验的总体发现一致,对于积极治疗的糖尿病患者,非泵CABG优于泵上CABG。 CTSNet分类:23 Almassi博士披露了与礼来和勃林格殷格翰的财务关系; 1年移植物的通畅率较低,而非复合型CABG的短期复合物趋势则较高。 Ebrahimi博士与Bristol Myers,Pfizer,Amarin,Astra Zeneca,The Medicines Company,Boehringer,Ingelheim和Sanofi Aventis进行了辩论。关于采用非泵技术进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的相对益处的争论仍在继续与传统的CABG相比,传统的CABG使用体外循环(通过泵)和心脏停搏[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号