首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Predicting Right Ventricular Failure in the Modern, Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Era
【24h】

Predicting Right Ventricular Failure in the Modern, Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Era

机译:在现代连续流左心辅助设备时代中预测右心衰竭

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Study DesignData AcquisitionStatistical AnalysisResultsUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Logistic Regression AnalysisQuantitative Preoperative Risk Score—CRITT ScoreIn the era of destination continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), the decision of whether a patient will tolerate isolated LVAD support or?will need biventricular support (BIVAD) can be challenging. Incorrect decision making with delayed right ventricular (RV) assist device implantation results in increased morbidity and mortality. Continuous flow LVADs have been shown to decrease pulmonary hypertension and improve RV function. We undertook this study to determine predictors in the continuous flow LVAD era that identify patients who are candidates for?isolated LVAD therapy as opposed to biventricular support.MethodsWe reviewed demographic, hemodynamic, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables for 218 patients who underwent VAD implant from 2003 through 2011 (LVAD?= 167, BIVAD?= 51), during the era of continuous flow LVADs.ResultsFifty preoperative risk factors were compared between patients who were successfully managed with an LVAD and those who required a BIVAD. Seventeen variables demonstrated statistical significance by univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified central venous pressure >15 mmHg (OR 2.0, “C”), severe RV dysfunction (OR 3.7, “R”), preoperative intubation (OR 4.3, “I”), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR 4.1, “T”), heart rate >100 (OR 2.0, Tachycardia - “T”) - CRITT as the major criteria predictive of the need for biventricular support. Utilizing these data, a highly sensitive and easy to use risk score for determining RV failure was generated that outperformed other established risk stratification tools.ConclusionsWe present a preoperative risk calculator to determine suitability of a patient for isolated LVAD support in the current continuous flow ventricular assist device era.CTSNet classification:27Dr Acker discloses a financial relationship with Thoratec.Ventricular assist devices (VAD) have demonstrated marked success in rescuing patients from heart failure [
机译:研究设计数据采集统计分析结果单因素分析多元Logistic回归分析定量术前风险评分-CRITT评分在目的地连续流左心室辅助设备(LVAD)时代,可以决定患者是否耐受单独的LVAD支持或需要双心室支持(BIVAD)。具有挑战性的。右心室延迟(RV)辅助设备植入的错误决策导致发病率和死亡率增加。连续流LVAD已显示可降低肺动脉高压并改善RV功能。我们进行了这项研究,以确定连续流LVAD时代的预测因素,以识别哪些患者应接受隔离LVAD治疗而不是双心室支持。方法我们回顾了2003年以来218例接受VAD植入术的患者的人口统计学,血液动力学,实验室和超声心动图变量到2011年(LVAD?= 167,BIVAD?= 51)期间,持续进行LVAD。结果比较了成功行LVAD的患者和需要BIVAD的患者的50种术前危险因素。通过单变量分析,十七个变量显示出统计学意义。多变量logistic回归分析确定中心静脉压> 15 mmHg(OR 2.0,“ C”),严重RV功能障碍(OR 3.7,“ R”),术前插管(OR 4.3,“ I”),严重三尖瓣关闭不全(OR 4.1, “ T”),心率> 100(OR 2.0,心动过速-“ T”)-CRITT是预测需要双心室支持的主要标准。利用这些数据,我们得出了一个高度敏感且易于使用的风险评分,用于确定RV失败,其表现优于其他已建立的风险分层工具。结论我们提供了一种术前风险计算器,可确定患者在目前的连续流心室辅助中是否适合单独的LVAD支持CTSNet分类:27 Acker博士披露了与Thoratec的财务关系。心室辅助设备(VAD)在挽救心衰患者方面显示出显著成功[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号