...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Thoracoscopic Talc Versus Tunneled Pleural Catheters for Palliation of Malignant Pleural Effusions
【24h】

Thoracoscopic Talc Versus Tunneled Pleural Catheters for Palliation of Malignant Pleural Effusions

机译:胸腔镜滑石与隧道胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液

获取原文

摘要

A malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a late complication of malignancy that affects respiratory function and quality of life. A strategy for palliation of the symptoms caused by MPE should permanently control fluid accumulation, preclude any need for reintervention, and limit hospital length of stay (LOS). We compared video-assisted thorascopic (VATS) talc insufflation with placement of a tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) to assess which intervention better met these palliative goals.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive MPE at a single institution from 2005 through June 2011. Primary a priori outcomes were reintervention in the ipsilateral hemithorax, postprocedure LOS, and overall LOS.ResultsOne hundred nine patients with MPE were identified. Fifty-nine patients (54%) had TPC placed, and 50 (46%) were treated with VATS talc. Patients who underwent TPC placement had significantly fewer reinterventions for recurrent ipsilateral effusions than patients treated with VATS talc (TPC 2% [1 of 59], talc 16% [8 of 50], p = 0.01). Patients treated with TPC had significantly shorter overall LOS (TPC LOS mean 7 days, mode 1 day; talc mean 8 day, mode 4 days, p = 0.006) and postprocedure LOS (TPC post-procedure LOS mean 3 days, mode 0 days; talc mean 6 days, mode 3 days, p < 0.001). Type of procedure was not associated with differences in complication rate (TPC 5% [3 of 59], talc 14% [7 of 50], p = 0.18), or in-hospital mortality (TPC 3% [2 of 59], talc 8% [4 of 50], p = 0.41).ConclusionsTPC placement was associated with a significantly reduced postprocedure and overall LOS compared with VATS talc. Also, TPC placement was associated with significantly fewer ipsilateral reinterventions. Placement of TPC should be considered for palliation of MPE-associated symptoms.CTSNet classification:14General Thoracic SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member or an individual non-member subscription to the journal.Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an end-stage manifestation of many cancers [
机译:恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是恶性肿瘤的晚期并发症,会影响呼吸功能和生活质量。缓解由MPE引起的症状的策略应永久控制体液积聚,排除任何再次干预的需要,并限制住院时间(LOS)。我们比较了视频辅助胸腔镜(VATS)滑石吹入和穿刺胸膜导管(TPC)的情况,以评估哪种干预措施更能达到这些姑息性目的。方法我们回顾性回顾了2005年至2011年6月在单个机构中进行的连续MPE。主要的先验结果是同侧半胸再次介入,术后LOS和整体LOS。结果109例MPE患者被确定。有59名患者(54%)接受了TPC,其中50例(46%)用VATS滑石粉治疗。与接受VATS滑石粉治疗的患者相比,接受TPC植入的患者对同侧反复积液的再干预明显更少(TPC 2%,59%中的1%,滑石粉16%,50%中的8%,p = 0.01)。经TPC治疗的患者的总LOS显着缩短(TPC LOS平均7天,模式1天;滑石平均8天,模式4天,p = 0.006)和术后LOS(TPC手术后LOS平均3天,模式0天;滑石平均6天,模式3天,p <0.001)。手术类型与并发症发生率(TPC 5%,[3 of 59],滑石粉14%,(7 of 50),p = 0.18)或住院死亡率(TPC 3%,%)无关。 [59中的2],滑石占8%,[50中的4],p = 0.41)。结论与VATS滑石相比,TPC放置与术后和整体LOS的显着降低有关。同样,TPC的放置与同侧的再介入明显更少有关。应考虑放置TPC以减轻与MPE相关的症状。CTSNet分类:14常规胸外科《胸外科CME计划年鉴》位于http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org。要进行与本文相关的CME活动,您必须具有STS会员或个人非会员订阅。恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是许多癌症的末期表现[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号