首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Cox-Maze IV Results for Patients With Lone Atrial Fibrillation Versus Concomitant Mitral Disease
【24h】

Cox-Maze IV Results for Patients With Lone Atrial Fibrillation Versus Concomitant Mitral Disease

机译:房颤和伴发性二尖瓣疾病患者的Cox-Maze IV结果

获取原文
           

摘要

PatientsStatistical AnalysisDiscussionReferencesThis study compared Cox-Maze IV (CMIV) outcomes for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with lone AF vs those with AF and mitral valve (MV) disease.MethodsSince 2002, 200 patients have undergone a CMIV procedure for lone AF (n = 101) or concomitantly with MV operations (n = 99). Preoperative, perioperative, and late outcomes between these groups were compared. Data were collected prospectively and reported at 3, 6, and 12 months.ResultsLone AF patients had AF of longer duration; patients with AF and MV disease were older, with larger left atria and worse New York Heart Association classification (p 0.05, respectively) was similar between both groups. Perioperative atrial tachyarrhythmias were more prevalent in patients with concomitant MV operations (57% vs 41%, p = 0.03); however, freedom from AF and antiarrhythmics was similar for both groups at 12 months (76% and 77%). The only predictor for atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence or arrhythmic drug dependence was failure to isolate the posterior left atrium (p < 0.01).ConclusionsPatients with AF and MV disease have distinct comorbidities compared with patients with lone AF. However, the CMIV is safe and effective in both groups and should be considered for patients with AF undergoing MV operations. Patients with MV disease had more atrial tachyarrhythmias at 3 months, but freedom from AF and antiarrhythmics was similar to patients with lone AF at 1 year. The posterior left atrium should be isolated in every patient, because this was the only predictor for failure of the CMIV for either group.Abbreviations and Acronyms: AF (atrial fibrillation), ATA (atrial tachyarrhythmia), CI (confidence interval), CMIII (Cox-Maze III), CMIV (Cox-Maze IV), IABP (intraaortic balloon pump), LA (left atrial), LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), MV (mitral valve), NYHA (New York Heart Association), OR (odds ratio), PM (pacemaker)CTSNet classification:24, 35Ms Bailey discloses that she has a financial relationship with AtriCure Inc; Dr Schuessler with AtriCure, Inc, Medtronic, Inc, and Estech; Dr Damiano with AtriCure Inc, Medtronic Inc, and ATS Medical; and Dr Maniar with nContact Surgical and Estech.The Cox-Maze (CM) procedure, created by Dr James Cox, was initially designed to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with mitral valve (MV) disease. However, because initial iterations of the CM procedure were complex, technically difficult, and time consuming, the procedure was preferentially performed as a stand-alone procedure on patients with lone AF [
机译:患者统计分析讨论参考文献本研究比较了Cox-Maze IV(CMIV)治疗孤立性房颤患者与房颤和二尖瓣(MV)疾病的房颤(AF)结果。方法自2002年以来,已有200例患者接受了CMIV手术AF(n = 101)或伴随MV操作(n = 99)。比较两组之间的术前,围手术期和晚期结局。前瞻性收集数据并在3、6和12个月报告。患有AF和MV疾病的患者年龄较大,左心房较大,纽约心脏协会分类较差(分别为p 0.05)在两组之间相似。伴有MV手术的患者围手术期房性心律失常更为普遍(57%,41%,p = 0.03);然而,两组在12个月时的房颤和抗心律失常的相似性相似(分别为76%和77%)。房颤性心律失常复发或心律失常药物依赖性的唯一预测因素是未能分离出左后房(p <0.01)。结论与单纯性AF患者相比,患有AF和MV疾病的患者有明显的合并症。但是,CMIV在两组中都是安全有效的,对于进行过MV手术的AF患者应考虑使用CMIV。 MV病患者在3个月时出现更多的房性快速性心律失常,但无房颤和抗心律失常的情况与1年时单纯房颤的患者相似。每位患者均应隔离左后房,因为这是任何一组CMIV失败的唯一预测指标。缩写和首字母缩写:AF(房颤),ATA(房速),CI(置信区间),CMIII( Cox-Maze III),CMIV(Cox-Maze IV),IABP(主动脉内球囊泵),LA(左心房),LVEF(左心室射血分数),MV(二尖瓣),NYHA(纽约心脏协会)或(赔率),PM(起搏器)CTSNet分类:24,35Ms Bailey透露她与AtriCure Inc有财务关系; Schuessler博士在AtriCure,Inc,Medtronic,Inc和Estech任职; Damiano博士来自AtriCure Inc,Medtronic Inc和ATS Medical; James Cox博士创建的Cox-Maze(CM)手术最初设计用于治疗二尖瓣(MV)病患的房颤(AF)。但是,由于CM程序的初始迭代非常复杂,技术上困难且耗时,因此该程序优先作为独立程序用于单发AF患者[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号