首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Completeness and Accuracy of Local Clinical Registry Data for Children Undergoing Heart Surgery
【24h】

Completeness and Accuracy of Local Clinical Registry Data for Children Undergoing Heart Surgery

机译:接受心脏手术的儿童的本地临床注册数据的完整性和准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Data routinely captured in clinical registries may be leveraged to enhance efficiency of prospective research. The quality of registry data for this purpose has not been studied, however. We evaluated the completeness and accuracy of perioperative data within congenital heart centers’ local surgical registries.;Methods Within 12 Pediatric Heart Network (PHN) sites, we evaluated 31 perioperative variables (and their subcategories, totaling 113 unique fields) collected via sites’ local clinical registries for submission to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database, compared with chart review by PHN research coordinators. Both used standard STS definitions. Data were collected on 10 subjects for 2 to 5 procedures/site and adjudicated by the study team. Completeness and accuracy (agreement of registry data with medical record review by PHN coordinator, adjudicated by the study team) were evaluated.;Results A total of 56,500 data elements were collected on 500 subjects. With regard to data completeness, 3.1% of data elements were missing from the registry, 0.6% from coordinator-collected data, and 0.4% from both. Overall, registry data accuracy was 98%. In total, 94.7% of data elements were both completeon-missing and accurate within the registry, although there was variation across data fields and sites. Mean total time for coordinator chart review per site was 49.1 hours versus 7.0 hours for registry query.;Conclusions This study suggests that existing surgical registry data constitute a complete, accurate, and efficient information source for prospective research. Variability across data fields and sites also suggest areas for improvement in some areas of data quality.;;Mr White discloses a financial relationship with CardioAccess.;Jump to SectionPatients and MethodsOverviewSources of DataLocal surgical registry dataCoordinator-collected dataStudy PopulationVariable SelectionAdjudicationAnalysisResultsStudy PopulationRegistry Data Completeness and AccuracyVariation Across Data Fields and SitesTime AnalysisCommentLimitationsConclusionsReferences;In this retrospective study (Fig 1Fig 1), perioperative data collected through two different methods were evaluated: (1) existing data in sites’ local surgical registries collected for submission to the STS-CHSD and (2) chart review by PHN research coordinators. Both used standard STS-CHSD definitions. Twelve US sites participating in both the PHN (9 core, 3 auxiliary sites) and STS-CHSD were included. Each site received institutional review board approval with waiver of informed consent.Fig 1Schematic diagram of study. (ASO?= arterial switch operation; AVSD?= atrioventricular septal defect; PI?= principal investigator; TOF/PS?= tetralogy of Fallot / pulmonary stenosis; VSD?= ventricular septal defect.);Jump to SectionPatients and MethodsOverviewSources of DataLocal surgical registry dataCoordinator-collected dataStudy PopulationVariable SelectionAdjudicationAnalysisResultsStudy PopulationRegistry Data Completeness and AccuracyVariation Across Data Fields and SitesTime AnalysisCommentLimitationsConclusionsReferences;Registry data were obtained by querying sites’ local surgical registries containing data collected and submitted to the STS-CHSD. Although practices vary across centers, these data are generally collected by a combination of clinicians and trained data managers. Resources for data managers include a manual of detailed data specifications including definitions, standardized training materials, regular phone conferences, updates on the STS Web site, site audits, and an annual symposium. STS variables are captured using standard definitions and nomenclature from the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code and Multisocietal Database Project [9][9]. Standard queries were developed to ensure uniform data extraction from the registry regardless of the software used by the center.;Data on the same data fields were also collected separately by trained PHN resea
机译:可以利用临床注册表中常规捕获的背景数据来提高前瞻性研究的效率。但是,尚未研究用于此目的的注册表数据的质量。我们评估了先天性心脏中心本地手术登记处围手术期数据的完整性和准确性。方法在12个儿科心脏网络(PHN)站点中,我们评估了通过站点本地收集的31个围手术期变量(及其子类别,共113个唯一字段)临床注册表要提交给胸外科医师协会数据库,然后由PHN研究协调员进行图表审查。两者都使用标准的STS定义。研究小组对2个到5个程序/站点的10个受试者的数据进行了收集和裁定。评估了完整性和准确性(由研究团队对PHN协调人对病历数据与注册表的同意,研究小组对结果进行了评估)。结果共收集了500个受试者的56,500个数据元素。关于数据完整性,注册表中丢失了3.1%的数据元素,协调员收集的数据中丢失了0.6%,两者均丢失了0.4%。总体而言,注册表数据的准确性为98%。总体而言,注册表中有94.7%的数据元素完整/不丢失且准确,尽管数据字段和站点之间存在差异。每个站点的协调员图表复查的平均总时间为49.1小时,而注册表查询的平均时间为7.0小时。结论本研究表明现有的外科注册表数据构成了前瞻性研究的完整,准确和有效的信息来源。跨数据字段和站点的可变性也建议在某些数据质量方面进行改进。;;怀特先生公开了与CardioAccess的财务关系;;跳转至患者和方法概述数据的来源本地手术注册表数据协调员收集的数据研究人群变量选择裁决研究分析结果研究人口注册表数据完整性和准确性差异跨数据字段和站点时间分析注释限制的结论参考文献;在此回顾性研究中(图1图1),对通过两种不同方法收集的围手术期数据进行了评估:(1)收集了站点的本地手术登记簿中现有数据以提交给STS-CHSD,以及(2) PHN研究协调员进行图表审查。两者都使用标准的STS-CHSD定义。包括了参与PHN的12个美国站点(9个核心,3个辅助站点)和STS-CHSD。每个站点都获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并放弃了知情同意。图1研究示意图。 (ASO?=动脉切换手术; AVSD?=房室间隔缺损; PI?=主要研究者; TOF / PS?=法洛/肺动脉狭窄四联症; VSD?=心室间隔缺损。);跳转至患者和方法概述注册表数据协调员收集的数据研究种群变量选择评判分析结果研究种群跨数据字段和站点的注册表数据完整性和准确性变化时间参考注释限制结论;注册表数据是通过查询包含收集的数据并提交给STS-CHSD的站点的本地手术注册表获得的。尽管各个中心的做法各不相同,但这些数据通常是由临床医生和训练有素的数据管理人员共同收集的。数据管理者的资源包括详细数据规范手册,包括定义,标准化培训材料,定期电话会议,STS网站上的更新,站点审核和年度专题讨论会。 STS变量是使用国际儿科和先天性心脏病法典和多社会数据库项目[9] [9]的标准定义和术语来捕获的。开发了标准查询以确保无论中心使用什么软件,都可以从注册中心统一提取数据;同样由受过培训的PHN resea分别收集相同数据字段上的数据

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号