首页> 外文期刊>The journal of headache and pain >A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine
【24h】

A comparison of preference for and efficacy of tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine

机译:舒马曲坦(50 mg和100 mg),纳拉曲普坦(2.5 mg),利扎曲普坦(10 mg)和佐米曲普坦(2.5 mg)在偏头痛急性治疗中对片剂的偏爱和功效比较

获取原文
       

摘要

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, five-way crossover study was conducted to assess patients’ preference for tablet formulations of sumatriptan (50 mg and 100 mg), naratriptan (2.5 mg), rizatriptan (10 mg), and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine and to identify determinants of preference. Patients treated one mild, moderate, or severe migraine with each triptan. The results show that sumatriptan 100 mg was significantly preferred over the random preference rate of 20% (p<0.001) whereas sumatriptan 50 mg, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were not. Patients’ primary reason for preferring a medication was best relief of migraine pain, and the treatment that patients preferred corresponded to the medication that was most likely to confer for them a pain-free response 2 hours postdose. Across all patients, efficacy 2 hours postdose was comparable among triptans with the exception of naratriptan, which was slightly less effective than the other medications (pain-free response 2 hours postdose: 40% sumatriptan 100 mg, 37% sumatriptan 50 mg, 28% naratriptan 2.5 mg, 38% rizatriptan 10 mg, 36% zolmitriptan 2.5 mg). The medications were also similarly well-tolerated. These data demonstrate that information on patients’ medication preference supplements and does not duplicate data from traditional efficacy measures. Patient preference data are useful in tailoring migraine therapy to the needs of the individual patient.
机译:这项随机,多中心,开放式,五向交叉研究旨在评估患者对舒马曲坦(50 mg和100 mg),纳拉曲坦(2.5 mg),利扎曲坦(10 mg)和佐米曲普坦(2.5毫克)用于偏头痛的急性治疗并确定偏爱的决定因素。患者使用每种曲普坦治疗一种轻度,中度或重度偏头痛。结果显示,舒马曲坦100 mg明显优于20%的随机偏爱率(p <0.001),而舒马曲坦50 mg,纳拉曲普坦,利扎曲普坦和佐米曲普坦则不是。患者偏爱药物的首要原因是可以最大程度缓解偏头痛,并且患者偏爱的治疗方法与最有可能在服药后2小时给予无痛反应的药物相对应。在所有患者中,曲普坦类药物给药后2小时的疗效与那曲普坦相当,但那拉曲普坦的疗效略逊于其他药物(给药2小时后无痛反应:40%的舒马普坦100 mg,37%的舒马普坦50 mg,28%奈拉曲坦2.5毫克,38%利扎曲普坦10毫克,佐米曲普坦2.5毫克)。药物的耐受性也相似。这些数据表明,有关患者用药偏爱的信息可以补充,并且不会重复使用传统功效指标中的数据。患者偏爱数据对于根据个别患者的需求定制偏头痛治疗很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号