首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance By Incorporating It Into the Verification Process in the Operating Room
【24h】

Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance By Incorporating It Into the Verification Process in the Operating Room

机译:通过将其纳入手术室的验证过程中来改善手部卫生标准

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Universal compliance with hand hygiene is fundamental to reduce infections, patient mortality, and health care costs. Since compliance is known to be poor, we implemented and evaluated two interventions to improve compliance in the operating room setting.Objective: We aimed to determine the compliance of hand washing in our operating room before and after implementing two process-improvement interventions. Our hypothesis was that these interventions would change the behaviors and ultimately increase the compliance among operating room personnel in using the alcohol-based hand sanitizers while entering and exiting the operating rooms.Methods: We randomly observed 1000 encounters of operating room personnel using the alcohol-based hand sanitizers while both entering and exiting the operating rooms in a university tertiary care center. Two distinct interventions to promote hand hygiene were implemented. Intervention A: displaying signs in strategic areas throughout the operating rooms. Intervention B: including hand hygiene in the time-out/verification process. Interventions were separated by 5 months.Results: We found that: A) the baseline compliance rate of utilizing the alcohol-based hand foam prior to any intervention was 7.6%; B) after Intervention A, the compliance rate increased to 11.2% (p=0.0511) and decreased to 10.4% after 5 months; C) after Intervention B, the compliance rate significantly increased to 70.8% (p<0.0001).Conclusions: The results of our study clearly show that the compliance rate of utilizing the alcohol-based hand sanitizers was poor and that interventions with clearly accountable results changed the behaviors and ultimately increased the compliance among operating room personnel. We conclude that incorporating hand hygiene into the time-out process is an effective process improvement intervention that boosts compliance of hand hygiene. This process improvement intervention may help reduce perioperative infection rates, mortality, and overall healthcare expenditures. Introduction Our largest organ system, the human skin, is composed of four distinct layers, each having its own physiologic purpose and function. The outermost layer, the stratum corneum, is composed of a tough horny layer of keratin that serves as the primary barrier against water and heat loss, pathogens, and other foreign bodies from entering our system. However, as much as this layer is designed to protect its host it also provides a reservoir rich in bacterial flora that can promote pathogen cross-contamination between healthcare workers and patients.The prevention of cross contamination with hand hygiene has been known since the mid-1800s. Its significance, however, was not universally appreciated until 1843 when Oliver Wendell Holmes recognized the role of transmission of contagions on the hands of physicians in the spread of puerperal fever.1 In addition, Joseph Lister identified the importance of antisepsis with carbolic or phenic acid in the practice of surgery2 Furthermore, the actual impact of hand hygiene on infection rates was indeed first demonstrated in 1847 by Ignaz Semmelweis when he remarkably demonstrated the effectiveness of hand hygiene in reducing postpartum maternal mortality from a high of 18.97% to about 3%.3Today, healthcare workers are generally complacent about following hand hygiene practices. As few as 5% of health care workers comply with the fundamentals of hand hygiene practices.4 In fact, in an observational study, Pittet et al. showed that physicians in a teaching hospital were less compliant with hand washing than other healthcare workers.5 Furthermore, Pittet et al. found that the average compliance rate with hand washing was only 48%.5 This lack of hand hygiene has been shown to contribute to the risk of infection.6 Furthermore, central line-associated blood stream infections have been linked with prolonged length of hospital stay, increased morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare
机译:背景:普遍遵守手部卫生对降低感染,降低患者死亡率和降低医疗成本至关重要。由于已知合规性较差,因此我们实施并评估了两种干预措施,以改善手术室环境中的合规性。目的:我们旨在确定在实施两种过程改进干预措施前后,洗手室中洗手的合规性。我们的假设是,这些干预措施将改变行为,并最终提高手术室人员在进出手术室时使用酒精类洗手液的依从性。方法:我们随机观察了1000次使用酒精类洗手液的手术室工作人员。基础的洗手液,同时进入和离开大学三级护理中心的手术室。实施了两种促进手部卫生的干预措施。干预措施A:在整个手术室的战略区域内显示标志。干预措施B:在超时/验证过程中包括手部卫生。干预间隔5个月。结果:我们发现:A)在进行任何干预之前,使用酒精基手部泡沫的基准顺应率为7.6%; B)干预A后,依从率上升到11.2%(p = 0.0511),而在5个月后下降到10.4%; C)干预B后,依从率显着提高至70.8%(p <0.0001)。结论:我们的研究结果明确表明,使用酒精基洗手液的依从率很差,干预措施的结果也很明确改变了行为,最终提高了手术室人员的依从性。我们得出的结论是,将手卫生纳入超时过程是一种有效的过程改进干预措施,可以提高手卫生的依从性。这种改善过程的干预措施可能有助于降低围手术期的感染率,死亡率和整体医疗保健支出。简介我们最大的器官系统是人体皮肤,由四个不同的层组成,每个层都有其自身的生理目的和功能。最外层是角质层,由坚硬的角质角质层组成,是防止水和热损失,病原体和其他异物进入我们系统的主要屏障。但是,尽管这一层旨在保护其宿主,但它也提供了一个富含细菌菌群的水库,可以促进医护人员和患者之间的病原体交叉污染。 1800年代。但是,直到1843年,奥利弗·温德尔·福尔摩斯(Oliver Wendell Holmes)意识到传染病传播在产褥热传播中的作用之后,人们的认识才得到人们的普遍认可。1此外,约瑟夫·李斯特(Joseph Lister)发现了石炭酸或苯甲酸对防腐的重要性此外,在1847年,伊格纳兹·塞梅尔维斯(Ignaz Semmelweis)确实首次证明了手部卫生对感染率的实际影响,当时他出色地证明了手部卫生对降低产后产妇死亡率的作用,从最高的18.97%降低到约3%。 3如今,医护人员普遍对遵循手部卫生习惯感到自满。仅有5%的卫生保健工作者遵守手部卫生习惯的基本原则。4实际上,在一项观察性研究中,Pittet等人。结果表明,教学医院的医生比其他医护人员对洗手的依从性更低。5此外,Pittet等人。发现洗手的平均依从率仅为48%。5已证明缺乏手部卫生会增加感染的风险。6此外,中心线相关的血流感染与住院时间的延长有关,发病率和死亡率增加以及医疗保健增加

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号