...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >A Blinded Analysis Of Anesthesia Machine Scavenger System Calibration In An Academic Medical Center
【24h】

A Blinded Analysis Of Anesthesia Machine Scavenger System Calibration In An Academic Medical Center

机译:学术医学中心麻醉机清除系统校准的盲法分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Exposure to trace gases in the operating has long been recognized as a potential source of increased risk of health problems in operating room personnel (1). Analysis of this risk has not shown an increased risk of mortality in anesthesiologists, but the anesthetic technique used may affect operating room trace gas levels as well (2,3). For example, pediatric anesthesiologists who may frequently use masking techniques which increase exposure to anesthetic gases may have increased risk of obstetric complications (4). The initial set up of the anesthesia machine includes calibration of the scavenging system (5, see appendix A). The components of the system and setup techniques are well described; however the uniformity of knowledge of this setup is unclear. The goal of our study is was to assess the frequency of appropriate scavenger system setup in a major tertiary institution; to the author’s knowledge, there are no studies assessing the frequency of appropriate scavenger calibration. INTRODUCTION Exposure to trace gases in the operating has long been recognized as a potential source of increased risk of health problems in operating room personnel (1). Analysis of this risk has not shown an increased risk of mortality in anesthesiologists, but the anesthetic technique used may affect operating room trace gas levels as well (2,3). For example, pediatric anesthesiologists who may frequently use masking techniques which increase exposure to anesthetic gases may have increased risk of obstetric complications (4). The initial set up of the anesthesia machine includes calibration of the scavenging system (5, see appendix A). The components of the system and setup techniques are well described; however the uniformity of knowledge of this setup is unclear. The goal of our study is was to assess the frequency of appropriate scavenger system setup in a major tertiary institution; to the author’s knowledge, there are no studies assessing the frequency of appropriate scavenger calibration. METHODS Our study was conducted by checking every anesthesia machine in our academic hospitals’ main operating room suite on a weekday morning after setup had been completed but before a patient was brought into operating room. In order to achieve this, between 6:30AM and 7:00AM the investigator examined each operating room’s anesthesia machine to determine if the machine’s scavenging system was appropriately calibrated. The 6:30am time was chosen because the anesthesia resident morning conference takes place from 6:30AM to 7:00AM and the room/machine setup should be done by this time. The practitioners setting up the operating room were unaware/blinded of the study assessing how well calibrated their anesthesia machine was. An example of a normal anesthesia machine with the scavenging device circled is demonstrated in Figure 1. A close up image of this system is (which is on the lateral posterior aspect of the anesthesia machine) is shown in Figure 2. The calibration status was recorded by hand using a premade spreadsheet depicted in appendix B; a key describing the variables recorded are included in the appendix. No changes were made to the anesthesia machine during this project. Finally, the study investigator acquired the staffing arrangements for each operating room from the anesthesiologist directing the operating rooms that day. No patient information was requested or recorded at any point.Follow up checks of the anesthesia machines in the same location occurred one week later after the initial assessment to see if the machine was subsequently appropriately calibrated in the interim. No changes were made to the anesthesia machine at this time as well. The study investigator, again, acquired the staffing arrangements for each operating room from the anesthesiologist directing the operating rooms that day. As before, no patient information was requested or recorded. The data was subsequently analyzed for trends suggesting any difference between the
机译:长期以来,手术室接触微量气体一直被认为是增加手术室人员健康问题风险的潜在来源(1)。对这种风险的分析并未显示麻醉医师死亡的风险增加,但是所使用的麻醉技术也可能会影响手术室中的痕量气体水平(2,3)。例如,可能经常使用掩盖技术增加麻醉气体暴露的儿科麻醉师可能会增加产科并发症的风险(4)。麻醉机的初始设置包括清除系统的校准(5,请参阅附录A)。系统的组件和设置技术都得到了很好的描述;但是,这种设置的知识的统一性尚不清楚。我们的研究目标是评估在大型专上学院建立适当的清除系统的频率;据作者所知,尚无评估适当的清除剂校准频率的研究。引言长期以来,手术室接触微量气体一直被认为是增加手术室人员健康问题风险的潜在来源(1)。对这种风险的分析并未显示麻醉医师会增加死亡的风险,但是所使用的麻醉技术也可能会影响手术室中的痕量气体水平(2,3)。例如,可能经常使用掩盖技术增加麻醉气体暴露的儿科麻醉师可能会增加产科并发症的风险(4)。麻醉机的初始设置包括清除系统的校准(5,请参阅附录A)。系统的组件和设置技术都得到了很好的描述;但是,尚不清楚此设置的知识是否统一。我们的研究目标是评估在大型专上学院建立适当的清除剂系统的频率;据作者所知,尚无评估适当的清除剂校准频率的研究。方法我们的研究是在工作完成后但在将患者带入手术室之前的一个工作日早晨,检查学院医院主手术室套件中的每台麻醉机。为了实现这一目标,研究人员在6:30 AM至7:00 AM之间检查了每个手术室的麻醉机,以确定该机器的扫气系统是否已正确校准。之所以选择上午6:30,是因为麻醉医师上午会议在上午6:30到上午7:00之间进行,因此应在此时进行房间/机器设置。设置手术室的医生对这项评估麻醉机校准程度的研究不了解/不了解。图1展示了一个带有扫气装置的普通麻醉机的示例。该系统的特写图像(在麻醉机的后侧)如图2所示。记录了校准状态手工使用附录B中描述的预制电子表格;附录中包含描述记录的变量的键。在此项目中,麻醉机未做任何更改。最后,研究调查员从当天指导手术室的麻醉师那里获得了每个手术室的人员安排。在任何时候都没有要求或记录任何患者信息。在初次评估后的一周后,对同一位置的麻醉机进行了后续检查,以查看随后是否对该机器进行了适当的校准。此时,麻醉机也未进行任何更改。研究研究者再次从当天指导手术室的麻醉师那里获得了每个手术室的人员配备安排。和以前一样,没有要求或记录任何患者信息。随后分析数据的趋势,表明两者之间存在任何差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号