Well, What Can You Do?: 'He is a dying man…'

摘要

Narcotic abuse is a significant problem in this country. Thanks to government initiatives, a growing number of drug abusers are entering rehabilitation where some are put on methadone maintenance therapy. When these patients seek medical, they may complain of pain and other symptoms that require the use of other opioids. Difficulties may then arise because of the complicated history of some of these patients. This paper describes one such case and aims to present a strong argument for all doctors to learn more about methadone and the patients on it. The case B was initially admitted to hospital with an infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). He still smoked and had previously misused opioids. At the time of admission, he was on methadone maintenance therapy.B's chest radiograph had shown a “suspicious mass” on admission. Further investigations eventually lead to a diagnosis of extensive non-small cell lung cancer. His prognosis was deemed poor. Our only option was to palliate. B was homeless. Now that he was known to have a terminal condition and would require long-term oxygen therapy, alternate living arrangements were needed. All these took time. B therefore stayed in hospital longer.Two weeks after his admission, B was observed talking to another patient on the ward about buying benzodiazepines from another inpatient. He was given a verbal warning. No further concerns were noted after that. Over the next few weeks, B began to complain of breathlessness and chest pain. Dexamethasone had been started soon after cancer was diagnosed. Nebulised bronchodilator and oxygen therapy had continued. Oral morphine sulphate was thus prescribed. His dose requirements however escalated rapidly. Prescribing increasingly larger “prn” and regular slow release doses of morphine that should have supported his calculated daily requirements did not affect this.This was a difficult situation. On one hand, we could see that B was clearly distressed each time he asked for more morphine. We knew that his disease was “a real one” and that his condition was terminal. On the other, we were aware that drug dependency had continued to be a problem for him. B never exhibited any signs of overdosing and did appear to be more comfortable each time after he received morphine. He never truly “settled” however.It was difficult to differentiate between the two possibilities. It was also felt that it would be unkind to try to do so now during his last days – “he is a dying man…” was the general feeling among staff. So, the situation continued. The social worker eventually found B an apartment. After a package of care was implemented, he was discharged from hospital. Follow up arrangements were also made with the community MacMillan team and methadone clinic. B was found near collapse the following day due to severe breathlessness at home. He was therefore readmitted. His breathlessness and pain continued to be difficult to control despite a trial of different opioids and other anxiolytics. He was eventually sent to the local hospice. Could we have done things “better”? As always, the retrospectroscope (and a literature review) provides one with 20/20 vision. Therefore, the answer is “yes”. It is necessary to revisit the main questions of this case to explain how and why:What was actually going on - addiction, dependence, tolerance or “real” pain and breathlessness? Keeping in mind B also had other “real” physical diseases, what was the likelihood that his somatic complaints were that severe?If the answer to question 2 is yes, then what (else) should we have done?What was B's problem?As Table 1 demonstrates, physical dependence, tolerance and addiction are separate phenomena but may also co-exist (1). Difficulties arose in this case because B's comorbidities contributed to his symptoms. Pain, breathlessness and anxiety are common complaints of patients with advanced cancer (Table 2) (2). His COPD and smoking would not have helped e