...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics >Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer
【24h】

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer

机译:含或不含纤维或纳米离聚物的硅氧烷基复合材料修复的牙髓治疗上颌前磨牙的抗断裂性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane-based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). RESULTS Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 ± 169a, G2: 360 ± 93b, G3: 632 ± 196c, G4: 692 ± 195c, G5: 917 ± 159d, G6: 1013 ± 125ad, G7: 959 ± 148d, G8: 947 ± 105d (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth.
机译:目的这项体外研究研究了使用硅环烷或甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料(有无纤维或纳米离聚物基体)修复的经牙髓治疗的前磨牙的抗断裂性。材料与方法将96例完整的上颌前磨牙随机分为8组(n = 12)。 G1(阴性对照)是完整的牙齿。在第2-8组中,进行了近中牙合器制备的根管治疗。 G2(阳性对照)保持未恢复状态。使用复合树脂按如下方式恢复其他组:G3,基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合物(Z250); G4,甲基丙烯酸甲酯与聚乙烯纤维的复合材料(Z250); G5和G6,分别是不带纤维和带纤维的基于硅氧烷的复合材料(Filtek P90); G7和G8,分别是具有纳米离聚物基的基于甲基丙烯酸酯和硅氧烷基的复合材料。在老化期和热循环1000次之后,测试断裂强度并检查断裂模式。使用ANOVA和Tukey HSD测试(α= 0.05)分析结果。结果八组(牛顿)的平均抗断裂强度分别为:G1:1200±169 a ,G2:360±93 b ,G3:632±196 c ,G4:692±195 c ,G5:917±159 d ,G6:1013±125 ad ,G7:959 ±148 d ,G8:947±105 d (不同的上标字母显示各组之间存在显着差异)。除第3组外,所有组中的大多数骨折都是可以修复的。结论基于硅氧烷的复合材料显示,与甲基丙烯酸酯相比,修复的前磨牙的强度明显更高。纤维插入对两种复合修复体的强度均无影响。然而,它增加了甲基丙烯酸酯基复合修复牙齿可恢复性骨折的患病率。在甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料下使用纳米离聚物基料对抗断裂性和图案有积极的影响。只有纤维增强的硅氧烷复合材料修复体的强度与完整牙齿的强度相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号