首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics >Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material
【24h】

Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material

机译:托盘粘合剂的干燥时间,以使聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模与托盘树脂材料之间具有足够的拉伸粘合强度

获取原文
       

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Use of custom tray and tray adhesive is clinically recommended for elastomeric impression material. However there is not clear mention of drying time of tray adhesive in achieving appropriate bonding strength of tray material and impression material. PURPOSE This study is to investigate an appropriate drying time of tray adhesives by evaluating tensile bonding strength between two types of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and resin tray, according to various drying time intervals of tray adhesives, and with different manufacturing company combination of impression material and tray adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS Adhesives used in this study were Silfix (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and VPS Tray Adhesive (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and impression materials were Aquasil Ultra (monophase regular set, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and Imprint II Garant (regular body, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). They were used combinations from the same manufacture and exchanged combinations of the two. The drying time was designed to air dry, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes. Total 240 of test specimens were prepared by auto-polymerizing tray material (Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Il, USA) with 10 specimens in each group. The specimens were placed in the Universal Testing machine (Instron, model 3366, Instron Corp, University avenue, Nowood, MA, USA) to perform the tensile test (cross head speed 5 mm/min). The statistically efficient drying time was evaluated through ANOVA and Scheffe test. All the tests were performed at 95% confidence level. RESULTS The results revealed that at least 10 minutes is needed for Silfix-Aquasil, and 15 minutes for VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II, to attain an appropriate tensile bonding strength. VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength when compared to Silfix-Aquasil over 15 minutes. Silfix-Aquasil had a superior bonding strength to VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil, and VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength to Silfix-Imprint II at all drying periods. CONCLUSION Significant increase in tensile bonding strength with Silfix-Aquasil and VPS Tray adhesive-Imprint II combination until 10 and 15 minutes respectively. Tray adhesive-impression material combination from the same company presented higher tensile bonding strength at all drying time intervals than when using tray adhesive-impression material of different manufactures.
机译:问题陈述临床上建议对弹性压印材料使用定制的托盘和托盘粘合剂。但是,在获得托盘材料和压印材料的适当粘合强度方面,没有明确提及托盘粘合剂的干燥时间。目的本研究旨在通过评估两种类型的聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模材料与树脂托盘之间的拉伸粘合强度,并根据托盘粘合剂的不同干燥时间间隔,以及不同制造公司对印模材料和托盘的组合,来研究托盘粘合剂的适当干燥时间胶粘剂。材料和方法本研究中使用的胶粘剂为Silfix(Dentsply Caulk,米尔福德,德尔,美国)和VPS托盘胶粘剂(3M ESPE,Seefeld,德国),印模材料为Aquasil Ultra(单相常规胶粘剂,Dentsply Caulk,Milford,德尔,美国)和Imprint II Garant(常规机构,3M ESPE,德国塞费尔德)。他们使用的是同一制造商的组合,以及两者的互换组合。将干燥时间设计为风干5分钟,10分钟,15分钟,20分钟和25分钟。通过自动聚合托盘材料(Instant Tray Mix,Lang,Wheeling,Il,USA)制备总共240个试样,每组10个试样。将样品放置在通用试验机(Instron,3366型,Instron Corp,大学大道,美国马萨诸塞州诺伍德市)中进行拉伸试验(十字头速度5mm / min)。通过ANOVA和Scheffe检验评估统计学上有效的干燥时间。所有测试均以95%的置信度进行。结果结果表明,Silfix-Aquasil至少需要10分钟,而VPS托盘粘合印迹II至少需要15分钟,才能获得适当的拉伸粘合强度。与Silfix-Aquasil相比,VPS托盘粘合剂压印II在15分钟内具有出色的拉伸粘合强度。 Silfix-Aquasil在所有干燥阶段均具有优于VPS托盘粘合剂-Aquasil的粘结强度,而VPS Tray粘合剂-印迹II的拉伸强度优于Silfix-Imprint II。结论Silfix-Aquasil和VPS Tray粘合剂-Imprint II组合的拉伸粘合强度分别显着提高,分别持续10分钟和15分钟。与使用不同制造商的托盘粘合印象材料相比,来自同一公司的托盘粘合印象材料组合在所有干燥时间间隔上均表现出更高的拉伸粘合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号