首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Microbiology >Protein fingerprinting may serve as a complementary tool for the phylogenetic classification of heterocystous (Nostoc, Anabaena, Cylindrospermum, Aulosira and Tolypothrix) Cyanobacteria
【24h】

Protein fingerprinting may serve as a complementary tool for the phylogenetic classification of heterocystous (Nostoc, Anabaena, Cylindrospermum, Aulosira and Tolypothrix) Cyanobacteria

机译:蛋白质指纹图谱可作为异型囊藻(Nostoc,Anabaena,Cylindrospermum,Aulosira和Tolypothrix)蓝细菌的系统发育分类的补充工具。

获取原文
       

摘要

A combination of morphology, SDS-PAGE, 16S rRNA gene and the fuzzy approach has been used for the first time to attest the phylogenetic affiliation of the cyanobacterial species such as Nostoc, Anabaena, Cylindrospermum, Tolypothrix and Aulosira. The idea was to ascertain as how far SDS-PAGE analysis and morphological taxonomy work coherently and serve as a reliable tool, compatible with 16S rRNA gene based classification of cyanobacteria. Intermingling of Nostoc and Anabaena species in SDS-PAGE and 16S rRNA gene indicates that the two taxa are not clearly separated at the genetic level and may be polyphyletic in origin. In contrast to this, clustering of Tolypothrix and Aulosira species in the same clade attests the taxonomic coherence of these species. However, Cylindrospermum showed greater phylogenetic relatedness with Anabaena strain in all phylogenetic analyses. Despite a few minor incongruities, protein fingerprint depicted greater similarity with 16S rRNA gene as compared to morphological taxonomy. Thus protein fingerprinting developed using fuzzy approach appears to be more compatible with 16S rRNA gene analysis than morphological taxonomy in discriminating cyanobacteria up to the species level. Introduction Cyanobacteria are the most widespread, photosynthetic prokaryotes with remarkable degrees of morphological and developmental diversity. Among the heterocystous cyanobacteria, Nostocalean strains are considered to be the most important component of the N2-fixing community in nutrient poor, arid and semiarid soils world wide (Doods et al., 1995; Potts, 2000; Wynn-Williams, 2000; Bhatnagar and Bhatnagar, 2005). Cyanobacteria have been traditionally classified on the basis of their morphological and physiological characteristics (Gietler, 1932; Desikachary, 1959). However, morphology of the strains may change depending on environmental conditions and the diversity of the strains can be altered by selective culture conditions (Palinska et al., 1996). For example the strains of Nodularia were found to loose gas vesicles (Lehtim?ki et al., 2000) and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae formed colony (Gugger et al., 2002) in their culture conditions. Komárek & Anagnostidis (1989) have estimated that more than 50% of the strains in culture collections are misidentified. To overcome these limitations, molecular method based on the use of small subunit rRNA gene has been proposed (Woese, 1987). The conservative nature of 16S rRNA gene, its universal distribution and the vast availability of sequence information in public databases (Genbank, EMBL, DDBJ and RDP) make it the marker of choice for taxonomical studies (Weisburg et al., 1991). The classification based on 16S rRNA gene analysis has been often compared with morphological identification and suffers from several limitations. Palinska et al., (1996) demonstrated that the divergence of the genera Synechococcus, Synechocystis, Merismopedia and Eucapsis based on morphological characters was not reflected in genetic diversity. Thus there is a need to develop another marker, which can complement the 16S rRNA gene based phylogeny in a more reliable manner as compared to morphology.SDS-PAGE whole cell protein pattern analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for bacterial identification having the advantages of being fairly fast and easy and, when performed under highly standardized conditions, it offers a better taxonomic resolution at species or subspecies level (Vandamme et al., 1996; Derbyshire and Whitton, 1968; Kersters and De Ley, 1975; Elliot et al., 1993). The SDS-PAGE protein profiles analysis has been successfully used to characterize various species of Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc (Perez et al., 2000), Staphylococcus (Berber et al., 2003) and thermophillic bacteria (Liu et al., 2006). However, the use of this technique in the characterization of cyanobacteria is still debatable. Palinska et al., (1996) used it for the first time to characterize Merismopedia and suggested it to
机译:形态学,SDS-PAGE,16S rRNA基因和模糊方法的结合已被首次用于证明诸如Nostoc,Anabaena,Cylindrospermum,Tolypothrix和Aulosira的蓝细菌物种的系统亲缘关系。这个想法是要确定SDS-PAGE分析和形态分类学在多大程度上可以连贯地工作,并可以作为可靠的工具,与基于16S rRNA基因的蓝细菌分类兼容。 Nostoc和Anabaena物种在SDS-PAGE和16S rRNA基因中的混杂表明,这两个分类单元在遗传水平上没有明确分离,并且可能起源于多系。与此相反,Tolypothrix和Aulosira物种在同一进化枝中的聚集证明了这些物种的分类学一致性。然而,在所有系统发育分析中,Cylindrospermum与鱼腥藻菌株的系统发育相关性更高。尽管存在一些微小的不一致,但是与形态分类法相比,蛋白质指纹图谱与16S rRNA基因的相似性更高。因此,使用模糊方法开发的蛋白质指纹图谱与形态学分类法在区分蓝细菌直至物种水平方面似乎与16S rRNA基因分析更兼容。引言蓝细菌是最广泛的光合作用原核生物,具有明显的形态和发育多样性。在多囊蓝藻细菌中,诺斯卡尔顿菌株被认为是全世界营养不良,干旱和半干旱土壤中固氮的最重要组成部分(Doods等,1995; Potts,2000; Wynn-Williams,2000; Bhatnagar)。和Bhatnagar,2005年)。传统上,根据蓝细菌的形态和生理特征对其进行了分类(Gietler,1932; Desikachary,1959)。然而,菌株的形态可能根据环境条件而改变,并且菌株的多样性可以通过选择性培养条件来改变(Palinska等,1996)。例如,在其培养条件下,发现根瘤菌菌株疏松了气体囊泡(Lehtim?ki等,2000)和Aphanizomenon flos-aquae菌落(Gugger等,2002)。 Komárek&Anagnostidis(1989)估计,培养物中50%以上的菌株被误认。为了克服这些限制,已经提出了基于使用小亚基rRNA基因的分子方法(Woese,1987)。 16S rRNA基因的保守性质,其普遍分布和公共数据库中序列信息的广泛可用性(Genbank,EMBL,DDBJ和RDP)使其成为分类学研究的选择标记(Weisburg等,1991)。通常将基于16S rRNA基因分析的分类与形态学鉴定进行比较,并且存在一些局限性。 Palinska等人(1996年)证明,基于形态学特征的Synechococcus,Synechochocystis,Merismopedia和Eucapsis属的多样性没有反映在遗传多样性中。因此,需要开发另一种标志物,与形态学相比,它可以以更可靠的方式补充基于16S rRNA基因的系统发育。SDS-PAGE全细胞蛋白质模式分析已成为一种强大的细菌鉴定工具,具有以下优点:它非常快速,简便,并且在高度标准化的条件下执行时,可以在物种或亚种水平上提供更好的分类学分辨率(Vandamme等,1996; Derbyshire和Whitton,1968; Kersters和De Ley,1975; Elliot等。 (1993年)。 SDS-PAGE蛋白质谱分析已成功用于表征各种乳酸杆菌和亮粘菌(Perez等,2000),葡萄球菌(Berber等,2003)和嗜热细菌(Liu等,2006)。然而,在蓝细菌的表征中使用这种技术仍然是有争议的。 Palinska等人(1996)首次将其用于表征Merismopedia,并建议将其用于

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号