...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology >Evaluation of the Individual Safe Correction of Antipsychotic Agent Polypharmacy in Japanese Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Validation of Safe Corrections for Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and the High-Dose Method
【24h】

Evaluation of the Individual Safe Correction of Antipsychotic Agent Polypharmacy in Japanese Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Validation of Safe Corrections for Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and the High-Dose Method

机译:日本慢性精神分裂症患者抗精神病药多药的个人安全纠正的评价:抗精神病药多药的安全纠正和大剂量方法的验证

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Polypharmacy for schizophrenia treatment is not justified by the available clinical evidence. We evaluated a treatment reduction approach that reduces the dose and number of antipsychotic medications simultaneously prescribed to patients. Methods: In a randomized open study of the Safe Correction of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High-Dose Prescriptions program funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, we evaluated a drug reduction method consisting of a dose reduction intervention performed on 163 patients with schizophrenia for twelve or 24 weeks. One antipsychotic medication was removed each week from each patient’s treatment regimen by reducing the dose by 0 to 50 chlorpromazine equivalents. Data on health-related indices of quality of life, clinical symptoms, and risk of side effects were analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures mixed linear model. Results: Despite a 23% reduction in antipsychotic dose, no differences in outcomes were observed between the dose reduction and observation groups (effect size = 0.001 – 0.085, P = .24–.97), despite high statistical power (1-β = 0.48–0.97). The findings are limited by the nonuniformity of the participants’ treatment history, duration, and dose reduction amount. Dose reduction protocol patients exhibited no difference in psychotic symptoms or adverse events compared with the observation group. Conclusions: Importantly, the low dropout rate in our study (6.9% of participants withdrew because of patient factors and 23.8% for all secondary reasons) indicates that our “slowly” method is well tolerated. We hope that this approach will result in therapeutic improvements.
机译:背景:现有的临床证据不能证明精神分裂症治疗的多药治疗是合理的。我们评估了减少治疗的方法,该方法减少了同时开给患者的抗精神病药物的剂量和数量。方法:在一项由日本厚生劳动省资助的抗精神病药多药房安全纠正和高剂量处方计划的随机开放研究中,我们评估了一种减少药物剂量的方法,该方法包括对163例患者进行的剂量减少干预精神分裂症持续十二或二十四个星期。通过将剂量减少0至50氯丙嗪当量,每周从每位患者的治疗方案中删除一种抗精神病药物。使用双向重复测量混合线性模型分析与健康相关的生活质量,临床症状和副作用风险指标的数据。结果:尽管抗精神病药物剂量降低了23%,但尽管统计学上具有较高的统计功效,但降低剂量组与观察组之间的转归没有差异(效应量= 0.001 – 0.085,P = 0.24-0.97)。 0.48–0.97)。研究结果受到参与者治疗史,疗程和剂量减少量不一致的限制。与观察组相比,减少剂量方案的患者在精神病症状或不良事件方面无差异。结论:重要的是,本研究的辍学率低(6.9%的参与者由于患者因素而退出,而23.8%的人出于所有次要原因退出)表明我们的“缓慢”方法耐受性良好。我们希望这种方法将带来治疗上的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号