首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >A randomised controlled trial of delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for managing uncomplicated respiratory tract infection in primary care.
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for managing uncomplicated respiratory tract infection in primary care.

机译:延迟处方抗生素作为一项在初级保健中控制单纯性呼吸道感染的策略的随机对照试验。

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection (cough) does not respond appreciably to antibiotics and that bacterial resistance is increasing, general practitioners (GPs) still prescribe frequently. AIM: To assess delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics for cough in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Open randomised controlled trial of delayed versus immediate prescribing of antibiotics. SETTING: One hundred and ninety-one adult patients with uncomplicated cough in 22 Scottish practices who would have received antibiotics under the GP's usual practice were randomised to receive either an immediate prescription (92 patients) or a delayed prescription (99 patients). METHOD: Delayed subjects were asked to wait a week before deciding whether to collect their prescription. Outcome measures included symptom duration, prescription uptake, patient satisfaction, patient enablement, and subsequent consultation rates. The 48 GPs who recruited patients were surveyed six months after the trial to see whether they used delayed prescribing as a part of their normal practice. RESULTS: Study and control groups were similar at baseline. Of the subjects in the delayed arm, 55% did not pick up their prescription. Although most patients were satisfied, more patients in the immediate arm were very satisfied with the treatment (P = 0.001) and the consultation (P = 0.03). The patients in the immediate arm were also more enabled (3.3 versus 2.4; P = 0.04), although more of them intended to consult for similar complaints in the future (85% versus 69%, P = 0.02). We were unable to detect any difference in actual consulting behaviour in the follow-up period (mean = 15 months [SD = 5 months]). Subsequently, 68% of GPs used delayed prescribing at least monthly; all gave the prescription to the patient. CONCLUSION: Delayed prescribing is effective at reducing the use of antibiotics for self-limiting cough; however, patients are less satisfied and enabled as a result. Patients may be deterred from consulting rather than becoming enabled.
机译:背景:尽管有证据表明简单的下呼吸道感染(咳嗽)对抗生素没有明显反应,并且细菌耐药性正在增加,但全科医生(GPs)仍然经常开处方。目的:评估延迟处方抗生素的策略,以减少在初级保健中咳嗽时不必要使用抗生素的策略。研究设计:延迟或立即开具抗生素处方的开放随机对照试验。地点:在GP的常规操作下,将接受抗生素治疗的22名苏格兰患者中的119名未发生简单咳嗽的成年患者被随机分配为立即处方(92位患者)或延迟处方(99位患者)。方法:要求延迟的受试者等待一周,然后再决定是否要收集处方。结果指标包括症状持续时间,处方摄取,患者满意度,患者能力和随后的咨询率。在试验后六个月对48名招募患者的GP进行了调查,以了解他们是否将延迟开药作为其常规治疗的一部分。结果:研究组和对照组在基线时相似。在延迟臂的受试者中,有55%的人没有接受处方。尽管大多数患者都满意,但更多直属患者对治疗和咨询非常满意(P = 0.001)(P = 0.03)。尽管他们中的更多人打算将来咨询类似的投诉(85%比69%,P = 0.02),但直接使用手臂的患者也更有能力(3.3比2.4; P = 0.04)。在随访期间(平均= 15个月[SD = 5个月]),我们无法发现实际咨询行为的任何差异。随后,有68%的GP使用了至少每月延迟的处方;都给病人开了药。结论:延迟开处方可有效减少自限性咳嗽的抗生素使用。但是,患者的满意度却降低了。可能会阻止患者咨询,而不是让他们接受治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号