首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Microbiology >Comparison of Multiplex PCR and Acid fast and Auramine-Rhodamine staining for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculosis Mycobacteria in Paraffin- Embedded pleural and bronchial tissues with granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis
【24h】

Comparison of Multiplex PCR and Acid fast and Auramine-Rhodamine staining for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculosis Mycobacteria in Paraffin- Embedded pleural and bronchial tissues with granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis

机译:多重PCR,耐酸和金胺-若丹明染色在石蜡包埋的胸膜和支气管组织中肉芽肿性炎症和干酪样坏死的结核分枝杆菌和非结核分枝杆菌检测的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of Acid fast and Auramine-Rhodamine staining and Multiplex PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex and nontuberculosis Mycobacteria on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues (FFPE) Material and Method: 40 cases of FFPE pleural and bronchial tissue with chronic granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis and 10 cases with bronchogenic carcinoma as controls were investigated. We designed a Muliplex PCR DNA amplification Method with two targets: 123bp DNA fragment from IS6110, which is present only in mycobactrum tuberculosis complex and 162bp DNA encoding Ag 85complex which is present in all of mycobacteria. The FFPE also stained by Acid fast and Rhodamine-Auramine staining method. Results: In 26 samples (%65) 123bp and 162bp DNA fragments were detected together .The 162bp fragment didn't detect alone. The sensitivity of PCR was %65 and the specificity was %100.11 cases were positive for Acid fast staining. There was %27/5 sensitivity and %100 specificity.13 cases were positive for Rhodamine- Auramine staining (R-A-S) there was %32/5 sensitivity and %100 specificity.All of the 10 controls were negative for 123bp and 162bp DNA fragments and for Acid fast and Rhodamine- Aauramine staining.Conclusion: Multiplex PCR is a sensitive, specific and rapid method for detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis in FFPE tissues. Introduction Despite longstanding efforts to conquer tuberculosis, this disease remains an expanding global health crisis with 1/86 billion infected people (1,2). Methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis improved in recent years and several molecular techniques for its diagnosis have been introduced for clinical use. Molecular methods provide several advantages, including confirmation of the presence of M.tuberculosis within 1 to 3 day (2,3).The use of DNA amplification for detection of M. tuberculosis in formalin. Fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples would be useful for patient's in whom diagnosis depends on tissue examination, rather than detection of M. tuberculosis in body secretion. (1,4)The diagnosis of tuberculosis is largely based on conventional approaches, which rely on clinical features and the result of microscopy and culture. Culture methods are sensitive and specific but they are slow and take 2-6 wks (3,4). Unfortunately, there are frequent occasions when tissue obtained by biopsy is not sent for culture because the diagnosis was not a clinical consideration before the report of findings on microscopic examination of the tissues. (6,13)Acid fast and Rhodamine- Auramine staining are rapid and inexpensive methods for diagnosis tuberculosis but their sensitivity is low. The number of bacilli in tissue section stained with Acid- fast and Rhodamine- Auramine staining seems to be much lower than that expected from the sputum smear data or the patients condition. (3,5 ,7)Infection caused by nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing in immunocompromised individuals. Effective therapeutic regiments are different for patients infected with M.tuberculosis or NTM.Therefore it is necessary to establish and evaluate PCR assay to differentiate between these two groups of mycobacteria.In order to establish sensitive Multiplex PCR, we selected two DNA targets : insertion sequences 6110 (IS6110) genes which present in multiple copies in the M.tuberculosis genome and the gene encoding Ag 85 complex.We also used Acid fast and Rhodamine- Auramine staining to evaluate the sensitivity of these methods and compare the results with Multiplex PCR. Material and Methods Forty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens(20 pleural, 20 bronchial samples) with granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis were obtained from lung biopsy files at the Department of Pathology of Ghaem Hospital from January 2002 to June 2005. 2 pathologists confirmed that every section included granuloma with caseous necrosis. The patients
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较耐酸和金胺-若丹明染色和多重PCR在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织(FFPE)上检测结核分枝杆菌复合体和非结核分枝杆菌的敏感性和特异性。材料和方法:40例以FFPE胸膜和支气管组织中慢性肉芽肿性炎症和干酪样坏死为例,以10例支气管癌为对照。我们设计了一种具有两个靶点的Muliplex PCR DNA扩增方法:来自IS6110的123bp DNA片段(仅存在于结核分枝杆菌复合体中)和编码Ag 85复合体的162bp DNA存在于所有分枝杆菌中。 FFPE也用耐酸和若丹明-金胺染色法染色。结果:在26个样品中(%65)一起检测到123bp和162bp的DNA片段,而162bp的片段不能单独检测到。 PCR的敏感性为%65,特异性为%100.11例,酸性快速染色阳性。罗丹明-金胺染色(RAS)阳性率为%27/5,特异性为%100。13例阳性的罗丹明-金胺染色(RAS)为%32/5 /特异性为%100。10个对照的123bp和162bp的DNA片段均为阴性。结论:多重PCR是检测FFPE组织中结核分枝杆菌的灵敏,特异和快速的方法。引言尽管人们为克服结核病做出了长期努力,但该疾病仍然是全球不断扩大的健康危机,有1/860亿感染者(1,2)。近年来,诊断结核的方法得到了改进,并且已经引入了几种诊断结核的分子技术用于临床。分子方法具有许多优点,包括在1至3天内确认结核分枝杆菌的存在(2,3)。使用DNA扩增技术检测福尔马林中的结核分枝杆菌。固定的石蜡包埋的组织样本将用于诊断取决于组织检查的患者,而不是检测身体分泌物中的结核分枝杆菌。 (1,4)结核病的诊断主要基于常规方法,这取决于临床特征以及显微镜检查和培养的结果。培养方法灵敏且特异,但速度慢,需要2-6 wks(3,4)。不幸的是,由于在组织的显微镜检查结果报告之前,诊断不是临床考虑,因此很多时候不通过活检获得的组织进行培养。 (6,13)耐酸快速和若丹明-金黄色胺染色是诊断结核病的快速且廉价的方法,但其敏感性较低。经耐酸和若丹明-金胺染色的组织切片中的杆菌数量似乎远低于痰涂片数据或患者状况所预期的数量。 (3,5,7)在免疫功能低下的个体中,非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)引起的感染正在增加。对于感染结核分枝杆菌或NTM的患者,有效的治疗方案有所不同,因此有必要建立和评估PCR方法以区分这两种分枝杆菌。为了建立敏感的多重PCR,我们选择了两个DNA靶标:插入序列在结核分枝杆菌基因组中有多个拷贝的6110(IS6110)基因和编码Ag 85复合物的基因。材料与方法自2002年1月至2005年6月,从Ghaem医院病理科的肺活检文件中获得了40份福尔马林固定,石蜡包埋(FFPE)标本(20块胸膜,20支支气管标本)并伴有肉芽肿性炎症和干酪样坏死。两名病理学家证实,每个切片均包括肉芽肿和干酪样坏死。病人

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号