首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >The psychological impact of cardiovascular screening and intervention in primary care: a problem of false reassurance? British Family Heart Study Group.
【24h】

The psychological impact of cardiovascular screening and intervention in primary care: a problem of false reassurance? British Family Heart Study Group.

机译:心血管筛查和初级保健干预的心理影响:错误的保证?英国家庭心脏研究小组。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There have been many reports of the adverse psychological effects of screening. Here we discuss the results of a randomized controlled study--one of the first to address this issue. AIM: To determine the extent to which participation in a population-based intervention programme that aims to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases raises concerns about health, or undermines a belief in the ability to reduce that risk. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial involving 13 general practices in England, Wales and Scotland was conducted. Two thousand, nine hundred and eighty-four middle-aged men and women undergoing cardiovascular risk-screening and intervention, and a randomized comparison group of 3,576 men and women from the same practices, who were not offered the intervention, were compared on three outcomes: perception of current health, perceived risk of suffering a heart attack, and perceived ability to reduce the risk of suffering a heart attack. RESULTS: We found no evidence to suggest that participation in this one-year, population-based intervention programme, to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease raised concerns about health or risk of a heart attack; indeed, those in the intervention group were slightly more optimistic about their health. Alterations in perceptions of current health and the risk of suffering a heart attack were associated directly with true alterations in risk factors. A more noticeable effect on participants in this intervention programme was a reduction in their perceived ability to further reduce their risks of a heart attack. This was associated with a decrease in weight and with quitting smoking. CONCLUSION: Contemporary screening and intervention programmes in primary care, aimed at reducing risk of cardiovascular disease, do not necessarily lead to raised anxiety or concern about health. A more subtle effect of screening would appear to be one of reassurance in the face of continuing, albeit reduced, risk.
机译:背景:有许多关于筛查的不良心理影响的报道。在这里,我们讨论了一项随机对照研究的结果,这是第一个解决此问题的方法。目的:确定参与旨在减少心血管疾病风险的基于人群的干预计划在多大程度上引起人们对健康的担忧,或破坏了人们对降低这种风险能力的信念。方法:进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及英格兰,威尔士和苏格兰的13种常规做法。分别对接受心血管风险筛查和干预的2984名中年男性和女性以及未接受干预的3576名来自相同实践的男性和女性进行了随机比较,比较了三种结果:对当前健康的感知,对遭受心脏病发作的感知风险以及对降低遭受心脏病发作的风险的感知能力。结果:我们没有发现证据表明参与这一为期一年的以人群为基础的干预计划,以减少心血管疾病的风险,引起人们对健康或心脏病发作的担忧。确实,干预组的人们对自己的健康略为乐观。当前健康观念的改变和患心脏病的风险与危险因素的真正改变直接相关。对这个干预计划参与者的更明显的影响是他们进一步降低其心脏病发作风险的感知能力降低。这与体重减轻和戒烟有关。结论:旨在降低心血管疾病风险的当代初级保健筛查和干预计划不一定会导致焦虑加剧或对健康的担忧。面对不断降低的风险,筛查的更为微妙的效果似乎是一种保证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号