首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Surgery >Physiologic Modification of the American Society of Anaesthesiology Score (ASA) for Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality after Emergency Laparotomy
【24h】

Physiologic Modification of the American Society of Anaesthesiology Score (ASA) for Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality after Emergency Laparotomy

机译:美国麻醉学会评分(ASA)的生理修改,用于预测紧急剖腹手术后的发病率和死亡率

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and aims:Laparotomy is commonly performed as an emergency operation. It is often performed on elderly patients with high risks of mortality and morbidity. Currently there is no accurate scoring system to predict preoperatively mortality and morbidity in these circumstances. This study was conducted to develop a scoring system that can accurately predict the risk of in-hospital mortality and complications for these patients in the emergency department prior to surgery. Patients and methods:Middlemore Hospital data were searched for patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for an acute abdominal condition between January 1997 and December 2006. Data collected included age, gender, presenting diagnosis, indications for surgery, acute physiological parameters and also data on associated comorbidities. We categorized patients for the risk of morbidity and 30-day mortality. The risk categorization was based on preoperative existing comorbidities and acute disturbances of physiological parameters. Regression analysis was used to correlate acute laboratory parameters, patients’ age and gender, clinical pre-morbid conditions and surgical procedures with the risk of mortality and rates of complications. Results:Emergency laparotomy was performed on 1712 patients. The median age was 58 and there were 896 male patients. Patients with one or two minor comorbidities had comparable mortality and complication rates to those with no comorbidities. There was high correlation between factors that denoted the onset of multiple organ failure and in-hospital mortality and complication rate; this allowed us to divide patients into four groups with increasing mortality and morbidity. Conclusions:Mortality and morbidity after emergency laparotomy is closely related to the presence or absence of severe acute physiological impairment and the presence or absence of chronic system organ failure. The SPI score is a simple scoring system for prediction of mortality and morbidity prior to emergency laparotomy. Introduction Emergency laparotomy is a commonly performed operation. It is frequently performed on elderly patients with a variety of acute pathological disorders that render these patients dehydrated, hypovolemic, and suffering from a systemic inflammatory response often with incipient multiple organ failure 12 . Compared with elective surgery, emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients over the age of 65 345 , where 50% of these patients have significant associated comorbidities 6 . Mortality in such patients has been reported to be between 22% and 44% 35 , and morbidity around 50% 7 .Mortality and complications in elderly patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for acute abdomen depend on perioperative risk factors and delay in presentation and treatment. Patients with conditions that only permit palliative surgery such as cancer and those who have acute mesenteric ischaemia, have particularly high mortality rates 5 . The acute physiological insult of abdominal pathology, added to chronic ill health, complicates the postoperative course 35 .Many scoring systems have been designed to predict mortality and morbidity in surgical patients; however, these systems are complex and require the collection of several clinical and pathological parameters that may not be available before the patent is taken for emergency surgery 8910 . As a result, none of these classification systems has found a place as a routine part of clinical practice in surgery.It would therefore be very useful to have a classification system based on clinical and laboratory measures that is able to provide an objective assessment of morbidity and mortality before undertaking surgical management 1112 . In the elective surgery setting, the ASA score is a commonly used system for prediction of morbidity and mortality; however, it is not specific to any particular procedure or specialty and does not allow fo
机译:背景与目的:开腹手术通常作为紧急手术进行。它通常在高死亡率和高发病率的老年患者中进行。当前,在这些情况下尚无准确的评分系统来预测术前死亡率和发病率。进行这项研究的目的是开发一个评分系统,该系统可以准确地预测这些急诊患者在手术前的院内死亡率和并发症的风险。患者和方法:检索1997年1月至2006年12月间因急腹症而接受急诊剖腹手术的患者在Middlemore医院的数据。收集的数据包括年龄,性别,诊断,手术指征,急性生理指标以及相关合并症。我们对患者的发病风险和30天死亡率进行了分类。风险分类基于术前存在的合并症和生理参数的急性扰动。回归分析用于将急性实验室参数,患者的年龄和性别,临床病前状况和手术程序与死亡风险和并发症发生率相关联。结果:1712例患者接受了紧急剖腹手术。中位年龄是58岁,有896名男性患者。具有一两个轻度合并症的患者的死亡率和并发症发生率与无合并症的患者相当。表示多器官功能衰竭发作的因素与院内死亡率和并发症发生率之间存在高度相关性;这使我们可以将患者分为增加死亡率和发病率的四类。结论:急诊剖腹手术的死亡率和发病率与是否存在严重的急性生理功能障碍以及是否存在慢性系统器官衰竭密切相关。 SPI评分是一个简单的评分系统,用于预测急诊剖腹手术前的死亡率和发病率。简介急诊剖腹手术是一项常见的手术。它经常在患有各种急性病理性疾病的老年患者中进行,这些患者会导致这些患者脱水,降血容量,并遭受系统性炎症反应,并经常出现多器官功能衰竭12。与选择性手术相比,急诊腹部手术的发病和死亡风险更高,尤其是在65 345岁以上的患者中,其中50%的患者有明显的合并症6。据报道,这类患者的死亡率在22%到44%之间35,发病率在50%左右7。老年患者急诊剖腹急腹手术的死亡率和并发症取决于围手术期的危险因素以及就诊和治疗的延迟。患有仅允许姑息性手术的疾病的患者(例如癌症)和患有急性肠系膜缺血的患者的死亡率特别高5。腹部病理的急性生理损伤,加上慢性病,使术后病程复杂化35。许多计分系统已被设计用来预测手术患者的死亡率和发病率。然而,这些系统很复杂,需要收集一些临床和病理学参数,这些专利在获得紧急手术专利8910之前可能无法获得。结果,这些分类系统都没有在外科临床实践中找到常规位置,因此基于临床和实验室指标的分类系统能够提供客观的发病率评估将非常有用进行外科治疗前的死亡率和死亡率1112。在择期手术中,ASA评分是预测发病率和死亡率的常用系统。但是,它并不特定于任何特定的程序或专业,并且不允许

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号