Infant male circumcision continues despite increasing qualms about its medical justification. It is likely that genital cutting has physical, sexual and psychological consequences. The aim of this study is to compare the results of traditional circumcision with preputial plasty. This study comprises 120 boys of an age from 1.5 to 14 years presenting with symptomatic phimosis. Patients with a phimosis and secondary preputial scarring underwent circumcision and patients with a narrowed foreskin and a history of recurrent balanitis, ballooning or local symptoms such as fissuration underwent bilateral lateral slit preputial plasty. Fifty patients were subjected to circumcision and the remaining 70 to bilateral lateral slit preputial plasty. After surgery, these patients were assessed on the 3rd postoperative day and at the end of 3 months for early and late complications and for cosmetic results. Preputial plasty is associated with less complications and superior cosmetic results. Bilateral lateral slit preputial plasty should be the preferred surgical technique in primary phimosis. It is an easy, safe, cosmetically and functionally more acceptable day-care procedure as compared to circumcision for surgical treatment of primary symptomatic phimosis. Introduction The prepuce is usually dismissed as a simple fold of skin and mucosa. At best, the prepuce is thought to protect the glans penis; at worst, it is a health hazard that may be avoided by circumcision. Not surprisingly, articles on the advantages and disadvantages of circumcision consistently fail to discuss the prepuce as a tissue worthy of preservation in its own right. 1 Infant male circumcision continues despite increasing qualms about its medical justification. It is likely that genital cutting has physical, sexual and psychological consequences. 2 Some studies link involuntary male circumcision with a range of negative emotions and even post-traumatic stress disorders. 2,3 In view of the immediate as well as long-term risks from circumcision and the legal liabilities that might arise, it is timely for us to re-examine the evidence on this issue and advisability of this surgical procedure on unconsenting minors. To circumcise means to cut off part of or the entire foreskin of the penis permanently exposing the normally covered glans.Phimosis is a term taken from a Greek word that means “muzzling”. At any age, abnormal narrowing of the preputial opening with ballooning during micturition is “phimosis”. It is not simply an unretractable foreskin, which is a common condition and considered normal up to 3 years of age. The prepuce is designed to be non-retractile in infancy and early childhood when the developing glans needs complete protection from the mechanical trauma of the clothing and the chemical trauma of ammoniacal urine. Phimosis is said to be the physiological condition of the newborn male with a tendency to spontaneous resolution. 4 Fundamental misunderstanding of the normal developmental process by which the prepuce becomes retractile (by a process of desquamation) has lead to large numbers of inappropriate referrals for circumcision. However, unretractable skin if left for prolonged period undergoes various inflammatory and infective processes. In these symptomatic patients (phimosis with infections or balanitis), circumcision has traditionally been regarded as the treatment of choice. 5 However, there are many who might benefit from the more conservative approach of preputial plasty; which avoids complications associated with traditional circumcision like bleeding, skin loss, asymmetry, chordee, meatal stenosis, urethrocutaneous fistula and keloids. 6,7 Patients and methods Institutional ethics committee approval as well as written consent from parents was obtained. This is a prospective comparative study carried out over a period of five years, in a tertiary referral center in a government medical college. One hundred and twenty boys of the age group from 1.5
展开▼
