首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Effectiveness of ear syringing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial and patients' experiences.
【24h】

Effectiveness of ear syringing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial and patients' experiences.

机译:常规情况下进行耳针注射的有效性:一项随机对照试验和患者的经验。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Ear syringing is a common procedure performed for a variety of symptoms in primary care. Reports of its effectiveness vary considerably and no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed. AIM: To estimate the effect of ear syringing on hearing thresholds and on symptoms leading to ear syringing in general practice. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised single-blind controlled trial. Before-and-after self-assessments of symptoms. SETTING: Patients from three general practices in the Bristol area attending twice-weekly clinics dedicated to ear syringing over a 12-week period. METHOD: Patients were randomly assigned to have their hearing tested before and after ear syringing, or twice before ear syringing. Changes in hearing threshold were measured by pure tone audiometry (PTA). All patients completed sef-assessment forms of symptoms using Likert scales before, and one week after, ear syringing. RESULTS: Hearing threshold improved by 10 dB or more in 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 21% to 47%) of the intervention group and 1.6% of control group (number needed to treat = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.2 to 5.2, P<0.001). The levels of improvement in the intervention group ranged between 15 dB and 36 dB. The symptoms that most commonly improved included hearing on the phone, pain, a feeling of blocked ears, and hearing one-to-one. There was a strong relationship between the change thresholds, as measure using PTA, and self-reports of hearing improvement. Secondary analysis was unable to identify predictors of objectively measured improvement. CONCLUSION: Ear syringing improved hearing threshold in a substantial proportion of patients. An even larger proportion reported an improvement in symptoms. It was not possible to predict which patients would benefit.
机译:背景:耳部注射是在初级保健中针对多种症状执行的常见程序。其有效性的报告差异很大,并且尚未进行随机对照试验(RCT)。目的:评估一般情况下耳道植入对听力阈值和导致耳道植入的症状的影响。研究设计:随机单盲对照试验。症状之前和之后的自我评估。地点:来自布里斯托尔地区的三种一般做法的患者,每周两次接受两次专门针对耳朵针刺的诊所,为期12周。方法:将患者随机分为两组,分别在进行耳塞术之前和之后或耳塞术之前进行两次听力测试。听力阈值的变化通过纯音测听(PTA)测量。所有患者在注射前和注射后一周用李克特量表完成症状的自评估形式。结果:干预组的34%(95%的置信区间[CI] = 21%至47%)和对照组的1.6%(需要治疗的人数= 3.1,95%CI = 13%)的听力阈值提高了10 dB或更多。 2.2至5.2,P <0.001)。干预组的改善水平介于15 dB和36 dB之间。最常改善的症状包括电话听觉,疼痛,耳朵阻塞的感觉以及一对一的听觉。使用PTA进行测量的变化阈值与听力改善的自我报告之间存在很强的关系。次要分析无法确定客观衡量的改善的预测因素。结论:在相当大比例的患者中,耳针注射可以改善听力阈值。更大比例的人表示症状有所改善。无法预测哪些患者将从中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号