...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >A randomized controlled trial of antibiotics on symptom resolution in patients presenting to their general practitioner with a sore throat.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of antibiotics on symptom resolution in patients presenting to their general practitioner with a sore throat.

机译:向就诊于喉咙痛的普通科医生就症状缓解进行抗生素治疗的随机对照试验。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common symptom presented to general practitioners (GPs), and there remains controversy about the appropriate use of antibiotics. AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of penicillin, cefixime and placebo on symptom resolution in patients presenting with a sore throat in general practice. METHOD: Twenty-two GPs in Avon recruited 154 patients, aged 16-60 years, presenting to their GP with a sore throat, and for whom the GP would normally prescribe an antibiotic. Patients were randomized to one of three groups: penicillin V 250 mg four times a day; cefixime 200 mg daily; and placebo. Each was prescribed for five days. The main outcome measures were a diary of symptom resolution over seven days and eradication of group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). RESULTS: Of the 103 (67%) patients who completed symptom diaries, 40 were allocated to receive penicillin, 29 cefixime and 34 placebo. In the analysis including all patients, symptom resolution was greater by day 3 in the cefixime group than in the placebo group. Penicillin did not improve symptom resolution by day 3 compared with placebo, and cefixime was not statistically significantly different from penicillin. There were significant differences in the proportion of patients using analgesia at day 3, with the proportion being lowest in the cefixime group. The results for the subgroup of patients without GABHS were similar to those for all patients; in particular, the only statistically significant difference was between cefixime and placebo. Although numbers were too small for statistical significance, among patients with GABHS the effects of penicillin and cefixime were similarly raised in relation to placebo. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, cefixime can improve the rate of resolution of symptoms in patients with a sore throat who are selected for antibiotic treatment by their GP. The unexpected finding that cefixime was of benefit compared with placebo for patients without GABHS suggests that bacteria other than GABHS may be important in the pathogenesis of sore throat.
机译:背景:喉咙痛是全科医生(GPs)的常见症状,关于适当使用抗生素仍存在争议。目的:在一项随机对照试验中,比较一般实践中青霉素,头孢克肟和安慰剂对喉咙痛患者症状缓解的有效性。方法:雅芳的22名GP招募了154名年龄在16至60岁之间的患者,他们的GP出现喉咙痛,而GP通常会为其开抗生素。患者被随机分为三组:青霉素V 250 mg,每天四次;头孢克肟200毫克每天;和安慰剂。每个处方开了五天。主要的预后指标是在7天内记录症状缓解日记和根除A组β-溶血性链球菌(GABHS)。结果:在完成症状日记的103例患者中,有40例被分配接受青霉素,29例头孢克肟和34例安慰剂。在包括所有患者在内的分析中,头孢克肟组在第3天的症状缓解率高于安慰剂组。与安慰剂相比,到第3天青霉素并未改善症状缓解,并且头孢克肟与青霉素在统计学上无显着差异。在第3天使用镇痛的患者比例存在显着差异,其中头孢克肟组的比例最低。没有GABHS的患者亚组的结果与所有患者的结果相似。特别是,统计学上唯一的显着差异是头孢克肟和安慰剂之间的差异。尽管数量太少,没有统计学意义,但在GABHS患者中,与安慰剂相比,青霉素和头孢克肟的疗效相似。结论:与安慰剂相比,头孢克肟可以提高喉咙痛患者的症状缓解率,这些患者是由GP选择抗生素治疗的。对于没有GABHS的患者,头孢克肟比安慰剂有益的意外发现表明,除GABHS以外的细菌可能在咽喉痛的发病机理中也很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号