首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Analysis of referrals of mental health problems by general practitioners.
【24h】

Analysis of referrals of mental health problems by general practitioners.

机译:分析全科医生转诊的精神健康问题。

获取原文
       

摘要

The majority of people in the community who have a psychiatric disorder will consult their general practitioner. Referrals from general practice to specialist services are, however, relatively rare. The filter between primary care and specialist care has been characterized by Goldberg and Huxley as the least permeable of the filters separating psychiatrists and other specialists from the populations they serve. These referrals form the subject of this study in the Netherlands. Using a large database of doctor-patient contacts, the proportion of mental health disorders resulting in a referral and the characteristics of the patient and general practitioner that are involved in such a referral have been determined. In addition, the type of mental health institution or specialist to which referrals were directed and the characteristics influencing this choice were examined. Only 6% of patients presenting with a psychiatric disorder during surgery hours were referred to specialist care. Younger patients, male patients and patients with severe diagnoses had a greater probability of being referred. The percentage of patients referred was higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Doctors with a limited task perception regarding mental treatment tended to refer more often. Although the diagnosis did have some relationship with the institutions to which patients were referred (psychotic conditions to psychiatric services and social/material problems to social workers), the most prevalent diagnoses (neurotic conditions and relationship problems) seemed to be more or less randomly distributed over the various possibilities. Preferences appeared to be related to the existence of regular meetings between general practitioners and specialists and a positive evaluation by general practitioners of the institution concerned.
机译:社区中大多数患有精神病的人都会咨询他们的全科医生。但是,从全科转诊到专科服务的情况相对较少。 Goldberg和Huxley指出,初级保健和专科保健之间的过滤器是将精神科医生和其他专家与所服务人群分开的过滤器中渗透性最低的。这些引荐构成了荷兰这项研究的主题。使用大型的医患联系数据库,已经确定了导致转诊的精神健康疾病的比例以及涉及这种转诊的患者和全科医生的特征。此外,还检查了转诊所针对的精神卫生机构或专家的类型以及影响该选择的特征。在手术时间内出现精神病的患者中只有6%被转诊至专科护理。年轻患者,男性患者和诊断严重的患者被转诊的可能性更高。在城市地区转诊的患者比例高于农村地区。对心理治疗的工作知觉有限的医生往往会更多地转诊。尽管诊断确实与转诊患者的机构有一定关系(精神病向精神科服务以及社会/物质问题对社会工作者),但最普遍的诊断(神经病和关系问题)似乎或多或少是随机分布的在各种可能性上。偏好似乎与全科医生和专家之间定期开会以及相关机构的全科医生的积极评价有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号