【24h】

Diagnosing depression

机译:诊断抑郁

获取原文
           

摘要

We have some concerns about the validity of the study by Gilbody, et al.1 Patients were recruited for a randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for depression in primary care. Thirty-six of 96 (93 in the abstract) patients (37.5 %) were diagnosed with major depressive disorder according to SCID. Such high prevalence indicates that patients were not randomly chosen from practices. Receiver-operating curve statistics was applied on this obviously highly-selected group of patients. This is misleading; any depression screening instrument may demonstrate excellent performance in such groups. For instruments to prove useful in general practice, statistics should be based on representative practice population samples.2–4
机译:我们对Gilbody等人进行的这项研究的有效性存有疑虑。1招募患者参加初级保健中抑郁症协作治疗的随机对照试验。根据SCID,有96例患者中有36例(抽象值为93例)被诊断出患有重度抑郁症。如此高的患病率表明,并非从实践中随机选择患者。接收者操作曲线统计应用于这个显然高度选择的患者组。这具有误导性;任何抑郁症筛查仪器都可能在此类人群中表现出出色的表现。为了证明在一般实践中有用的工具,统计数据应基于具有代表性的实践人群样本。2-4

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号