【24h】

Assisted suicide debate

机译:协助自杀辩论

获取原文
       

摘要

I have just received the November Journal here in Australia and was incensed to read the letters against assisted suicide and euthanasia and cheering the decision of the College. What right do the writers have to decide that my life should be prolonged against my wishes? Is it an edict of their mythical God? As for suffering being good for you – I did not spend years training to relieve suffering in order to be able to say to patients ‘You suffer a bit chum, it's good for you.’ I do not believe it would have been appreciated. Perhaps I should have gone to theological college?
机译:我刚刚在澳大利亚这里收到《十一月刊》,被激怒了,以阅读反对协助自杀和安乐死的信,并为学院的决定欢呼。作家们有什么权利决定延长我的寿命,以违背我​​的意愿?这是他们神话般的上帝的dict书吗?至于对您有好处的痛苦–我没有花费多年的培训来减轻痛苦,以便能够对患者说“您遭受了重击,对您有好处。”我不相信会受到赞赏。也许我应该去神学院?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号