【24h】

Participatory and evidence-informed general practice

机译:参与式和循证医学

获取原文
           

摘要

Evidence-informed health care requires clinicians to combine their clinical experience with research evidence, in addition to the values of their patients.1,2 There is a complementary argument for participatory approaches that integrate clinical experience and patient values within evidence-informed clinical guidelines and standards of care. This melding of patients' values and evidence is challenging for two reasons. The first challenge is how to integrate, rather than choose between, these different forms of knowledge when making decisions about how services should operate. The second challenge is how to involve many clinicians and many service users in decisions with wide-reaching consequences. Making decisions collectively about priorities and standards raises questions about whom to involve and how, and about the evidence to inform these decisions.
机译:循证医学保健需要临床医生将临床经验与患者的价值相结合。1,2对于参与性方法,有一个补充论点,即将循证医学知识和临床经验与临床经验和患者价值相结合。护理标准。患者价值观和证据的融合具有挑战性,原因有两个。第一个挑战是在决定服务的运行方式时如何整合而不是在这些不同形式的知识之间进行选择。第二个挑战是如何使许多临床医生和许多服务使用者参与具有广泛影响的决策。有关优先级和标准的集体决策提出了以下问题:涉及谁,如何参与以及为这些决策提供依据的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号