首页> 外文期刊>The Cryosphere >Antarctic summer sea ice concentration and extent: comparison of ODEN 2006 ship observations, satellite passive microwave and NIC sea ice charts
【24h】

Antarctic summer sea ice concentration and extent: comparison of ODEN 2006 ship observations, satellite passive microwave and NIC sea ice charts

机译:南极夏季海冰浓度和范围:ODEN 2006船观测,卫星无源微波和NIC海冰图的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Antarctic sea ice cover has shown a slight increase (<1%/decade) inoverall observed ice extent as derived from satellite mapping from 1979 to2008, contrary to the decline observed in the Arctic regions. Spatial andtemporal variations of the Antarctic sea ice however remain a significantproblem to monitor and understand, primarily due to the vastness andremoteness of the region. While satellite remote sensing has provided andhas great future potential to monitor the variations and changes of sea ice,uncertainties remain unresolved. In this study, the National Ice Center(NIC) ice edge and the AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System) ice extent are examined, while the ASPeCt (AntarcticSea Ice Process and Climate) ship observations from the Oden expedition inDecember 2006 are used as ground truth to verify the two products duringAntarctic summer. While there is a general linear trend between ASPeCt andAMSR-E ice concentration estimates, there is poor correlation (R2=0.41)and AMSR-E tends to underestimate the low ice concentrations. We also foundthat the NIC sea ice edge agrees well with ship observations, while theAMSR-E shows the ice edge further south, consistent with its poorerdetection of low ice concentrations. The northward extent of the ice edge atthe time of observation (NIC) had mean values varying from 38 km to 102 kmgreater on different days for the area as compared with the AMSR-E sea iceextent. For the circumpolar area as a whole in the December period examined,AMSR-E therefore may underestimate the area inside the ice edge at this timeby up to 14% or, 1.5 million km2 less area, compared to the NIC icecharts. Preliminary comparison of satellite scatterometer data however,suggests better resolution of low concentrations than passive microwave, andtherefore better agreement with ship observations and NIC charts of the areainside the ice edge during Antarctic summer. A reanalysis data set forAntarctic sea ice extent that relies on the decade long scatterometer andhigh resolution satellite data set, instead of passive microwave, maytherefore give better fidelity for the recent sea ice climatology.
机译:从1979年至2008年的卫星测绘得出,南极海冰覆盖范围总体观测到的冰范围略有增加(<1%/十年),与北极地区观测到的下降相反。然而,南极海冰的时空变化仍然是一个重要的监测和理解问题,这主要是由于该地区的广阔和遥远。尽管卫星遥感已经提供了监测海冰变化和变化的巨大潜力,但不确定性仍未解决。在这项研究中,检查了国家冰中心(NIC)的冰边缘和AMSR-E(高级微波扫描辐射计-地球观测系统)的冰范围,而ASPeCt(南极海冰过程和气候)则从12月的关东煮(Oden)船上进行观测在南极夏季,以2006年为基础验证了这两种产品。虽然ASPeCt和AMSR-E冰浓度估计值之间存在总体线性趋势,但相关性很差( R 2 = 0.41),AMSR-E往往会低估低冰量浓度。我们还发现,NIC的海冰边缘与船舶观测非常吻合,而AMSR-E显示的冰边缘更靠南,这与对低冰浓度的较差检测相符。与AMSR-E的海冰范围相比,该地区在观察时(NIC)的冰边缘向北延伸的平均值在不同日期的更大范围从38 km到102 km。因此,对于所研究的整个十二月的极地地区,AMSR-E这次可能低估了冰缘内部的面积达14%,即少了150万km 2 NIC冰图。卫星散射计数据的初步比较建议,低浓度的分辨率要比无源微波更好,因此与南极夏季冰边缘内区域的船舶观测和NIC图表更好地吻合。因此,依赖于长达十年的散射仪和高分辨率卫星数据集的南极海冰范围的重新分析数据集,而不是被动微波,可能因此为最近的海冰气候提供更好的保真度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号