...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Rechallenge with clozapine following leucopenia or neutropenia during previous therapy
【24h】

Rechallenge with clozapine following leucopenia or neutropenia during previous therapy

机译:先前治疗期间白细胞减少或中性粒细胞减少后用氯氮平进行的再治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Further treatment with clozapine is contraindicated in any patient who has previously experienced leucopenia or neutropenia during clozapine therapy. Aims To investigate the results of such a rechallenge in 53 patients. Method An analysis was made of the demographic, haematological and outcome data of patients in the UK and Ireland who were rechallenged with clozapine following leucopenia or neutropenia during previous clozapine therapy. Results Of 53 patients who were rechallenged, 20 (38%) experienced a further blood dyscrasia. In 17 of these 20 patients (85%) the second blood dyscrasia was more severe ( P 0.001), in 12 (60%) it lasted longer ( P =0.0368) and in 17 (85%) it occurred more quickly on rechallenge ( P 0.001). Of the original 53 patients, 55% (29 patients) are still receiving clozapine. Conclusions No clear risk factor for repeat blood dyscrasias was identified. Despite this, after risks and benefits have been considered, rechallenge may well be justified in some patients.
机译:背景技术在氯氮平治疗期间曾经历白细胞减少或中性粒细胞减少的任何患者均禁止使用氯氮平进行进一步治疗。目的调查53例患者再挑战的结果。方法分析了英国和爱尔兰患者在先前的氯氮平治疗期间因白细胞减少或中性粒细胞减少而接受氯氮平治疗的患者的人口统计学,血液学和预后数据。结果53名再次接受挑战的患者中,有20名(38%)经历了进一步的血液异常。在这20例患者中的17例(85%)中,第二次血液异常不良更为严重(P <0.001),在12例(60%)中持续时间更长(P = 0.0368),而在17例(85%)中,再次挑战发生的速度更快(P <0.001)。在最初的53位患者中,有55%(29位患者)仍在接受氯氮平治疗。结论尚无明确的重复性血液异常的危险因素。尽管如此,在考虑了风险和收益之后,在某些患者中再次挑战仍然是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号