首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 1—Comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD
【24h】

Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 1—Comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD

机译:头颅标志物的自动识别:第1部分-最新的深度学习方法YOLOV3和SSD的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the accuracy and computational efficiency of two of the latest deep-learning algorithms for automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Materials and Methods: A total of 1028 cephalometric radiographic images were selected as learning data that trained You-Only-Look-Once version 3 (YOLOv3) and Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) methods. The number of target labeling was 80 landmarks. After the deep-learning process, the algorithms were tested using a new test data set composed of 283 images. Accuracy was determined by measuring the point-to-point error and success detection rate and was visualized by drawing scattergrams. The computational time of both algorithms was also recorded. Results: The YOLOv3 algorithm outperformed SSD in accuracy for 38 of 80 landmarks. The other 42 of 80 landmarks did not show a statistically significant difference between YOLOv3 and SSD. Error plots of YOLOv3 showed not only a smaller error range but also a more isotropic tendency. The mean computational time spent per image was 0.05 seconds and 2.89 seconds for YOLOv3 and SSD, respectively. YOLOv3 showed approximately 5% higher accuracy compared with the top benchmarks in the literature. Conclusions: Between the two latest deep-learning methods applied, YOLOv3 seemed to be more promising as a fully automated cephalometric landmark identification system for use in clinical practice.
机译:目的:比较两种最新的深度学习算法的准确性和计算效率,这些算法可以自动识别脑波测量学界标。材料和方法:总共选择了1028幅头颅射线照相图像作为学习数据,以训练“仅看一次”第3版(YOLOv3)和“单发多盒检测器”(SSD)方法。目标标签的数量为80个地标。在深度学习过程之后,使用由283张图像组成的新测试数据集对算法进行了测试。通过测量点对点错误和成功检测率来确定准确性,并通过绘制散点图将其可视化。还记录了两种算法的计算时间。结果:在80个地标中,有38个地标的YOLOv3算法的精度优于SSD。 80个地标中的其他42个在YOLOv3和SSD之间没有显示统计学上的显着差异。 YOLOv3的误差图不仅显示出较小的误差范围,而且还显示出各向同性的趋势。对于YOLOv3和SSD,每个图像花费的平均计算时间分别为0.05秒和2.89秒。与文献中的顶级基准相比,YOLOv3的准确性提高了约5%。结论:在应用的两种最新的深度学习方法之间,YOLOv3作为在临床实践中使用的全自动头部测量界标识别系统似乎更有希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号