...
首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Combined effects of repeated oral hygiene motivation and type of toothbrush on orthodontic patients: A blind randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Combined effects of repeated oral hygiene motivation and type of toothbrush on orthodontic patients: A blind randomized clinical trial

机译:反复口腔卫生动机和牙刷类型对正畸患者的综合影响:一项随机临床随机试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To investigate the effects on plaque index (PI) scores of manual or electric toothbrush with or without repeated oral hygiene instructions (OHI) and motivation on patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Materials and Methods: One month after the orthodontic fixed appliance bonding on both arches, 60 patients were randomly assigned to four groups; groups E1 (n = 15) and E2 (n = 15) received a powered rotating-oscillating toothbrush, and groups M1 (n = 15) and M2 (n = 15) received a manual toothbrush. Groups E1 and M1 received OHI and motivation at baseline (T0) and after 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20?weeks (T4, T8, T12, T16, and T20, respectively) by a Registered Dental Hygienist; groups E2 and M2 received OHI and motivation only at baseline. At each time point a blinded examiner scored plaque of all teeth using the modified Quigley-Hein PI. Results: In all groups the PI score decreased significantly over time, and there were differences among groups at T8, T12, T16, and T20. At T8, PI scores of group E1 were lower than those of group E2, and at T12, T16, and T20, PI scores of groups M1 and E1 were lower compared to those of groups M2 and E2. A linear mixed model showed that the effect of repeated OHI and motivation during time was statistically significant, independently from the use of manual or electric toothbrush. Conclusions: The present results showed that repeated OHI and motivation are crucial in reducing PI score in orthodontic patients, independent of the type of toothbrush used.
机译:目的:研究使用或不使用重复口腔卫生说明(OHI)对手动或电动牙刷的牙菌斑指数(PI)得分的影响以及动机对佩戴固定正畸矫治器的患者的影响。材料与方法:将正畸固定矫治器固定在两个足弓上一个月后,将60例患者随机分为四组。 E1组(n = 15)和E2组(n = 15)接收了电动旋转牙刷,M1组(n = 15)和M2组(n = 15)接收了手动牙刷。 E1和M1组在基线(T0)以及4、8、12、16和20周后(分别为T4,T8,T12,T16和T20)接受OHI和动力治疗; E2和M2组仅在基线时获得OHI和动力。在每个时间点,盲人的检查员使用改良的Quigley-Hein PI对所有牙齿的牙菌斑进行评分。结果:所有组的PI评分均随时间显着下降,并且在T8,T12,T16和T20的组之间存在差异。在T8时,E1组的PI得分低于E2组,在T12,T16和T20时,M1和E1组的PI得分低于M2和E2组。线性混合模型表明,重复使用OHI和一段时间内的动机所产生的影响具有统计学意义,与使用手动或电动牙刷无关。结论:目前的结果表明,重复使用OHI和动力对于降低正畸患者的PI评分至关重要,与所使用的牙刷类型无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号