...
首页> 外文期刊>Technical Gazette >Eye movement analysis of image quality parameters compared to subjective image quality assessment
【24h】

Eye movement analysis of image quality parameters compared to subjective image quality assessment

机译:眼动分析图像质量参数与主观图像质量评估的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Image quality can be determined by using objective or subjective quality assessment methods. Objective methods are based on mathematical measures, such as PSNR, SSIM or RMSE and subjective testing is generally performed by asking the participants which of the given options they prefer or to give a quality score for the presented options. For each image quality evaluation, an image database is required. We developed a novel image database that consists of 30 images on which we applied some manipulations based on different quality parameters. First we conducted testing with the eye-tracking method: by showing images to test participants and measuring their eye movement, we received accurate information about how each of the image quality parameters affected the communication value of each image. The subjective quality assessment method we then employed involved the development of an application for crowdsourcing-based testing. Participants had to determine which of the images the best were. Finally, a correlation between both methods was determined.
机译:可以通过使用客观或主观质量评估方法来确定图像质量。客观方法是基于数学测量方法(例如PSNR,SSIM或RMSE)的,而主观测试通常是通过询问参与者他们更喜欢哪个给定的选项或给出所给出的选项的质量得分来进行的。对于每个图像质量评估,都需要一个图像数据库。我们开发了一个由30张图像组成的新颖图像数据库,并根据不同的质量参数对其进行了一些处理。首先,我们使用眼动追踪方法进行测试:通过向参与者显示图像并测量他们的眼球运动,我们获得了有关每个图像质量参数如何影响每个图像的交流值的准确信息。然后,我们采用的主观质量评估方法涉及基于众包测试的应用程序的开发。参与者必须确定最好的图像。最后,确定两种方法之间的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号