...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology in cancer research & treatment. >Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer
【24h】

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus 3D Non-Coplanar Conformal Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer

机译:立体定向放射疗法:容积调制电弧疗法与3D非共面保形放射疗法治疗早期肺癌

获取原文
           

摘要

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be >30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/VPTV of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (ρ = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: ρ = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion.
机译:立体定向放射疗法(SBRT)是早期肺癌患者的治疗选择。使用非共面3D保形放射疗法(3D-CRT),治疗时间可以大于30分钟/部分。虽然通常对此具有良好的耐受性,但是期望更快的递送技术。体积调制电弧疗法(VMAT)可以快速提供放射治疗。这项计划研究的目的是将SBRT与3D-CRT和VMAT进行比较,以及使用单弧和3个非共面局部弧生成的VMAT计划。选择10例先前接受3D-CRT SBRT治疗的患者(4部分为48 Gy)。制定了VMAT计划以治疗PTV,同时限制对有风险器官的剂量。使用Wilcoxon配对对测试比较了三种技术之间的累积剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数。还评估了治疗的交付时间。两种VMAT技术都比3D-CRT更符合目标体积,其中3D-CRT的平均V48 / VPTV为1.21,3弧计划为1.03,单弧计划为1.01(ρ= 0.005)。使用所有三种技术均满足了对处于风险中的器官的剂量限制。 3D-CRT的平均肺部剂量为2.93 Gy,单弧和3弧技术的平均肺部剂量为2.87 Gy(3弧vs. 3D-CRT:ρ= 0.009)。用于3D-CRT,1弧和3弧的肺V20分别为3.24%,2.89%和2.73%(3弧vs.3D-CRT:ρ= 0.028)。 3D-CRT的平均交付时间为13分钟,3弧度为9.2分钟,1弧度为5.5分钟。与3D-CRT相比,VMAT改善了保形性。 3弧技术似乎对肺部的剂量最低,尽管其幅度不太可能具有临床意义。与3D-CRT相比,VMAT的主要优势是更快的治疗交付时间。预期缩短的治疗时间可改善治疗的耐受性,并减少因部分运动引起的错误机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号