首页> 外文期刊>Technology in cancer research & treatment. >The Prognostic Value of Percentage of Positive Biopsy Cores, Percentage of Cancer Volume, and Maximum Involvement of Biopsy Cores in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Proton and Photon Beam Therapy
【24h】

The Prognostic Value of Percentage of Positive Biopsy Cores, Percentage of Cancer Volume, and Maximum Involvement of Biopsy Cores in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Proton and Photon Beam Therapy

机译:在接受质子和光子束治疗的前列腺癌患者中,阳性活检芯百分比,癌症体积百分比和最大活检芯预后的预后价值

获取原文
       

摘要

The purpose of the study is to compare the prognostic value of percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), percentage of cancer volume (PCV), and maximum involvement of biopsy cores (MIBC) as a prognostic factor in low- and intermediate-risk patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who received proton or photon beam therapy. Four hundred and fifty-nine patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma who were treated with proton or photon beam therapy at Loma Linda University Medical Center were used for this analysis. Patients were treated with a median dose of 74.0 Gy (range 70.2–79.2) proton or combined proton/photon beam radiotherapy. Pathology reports were reviewed and PPBC, PCV, and MIBC were recorded. Analysis of biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) outcome was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Cox regression multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of the biopsy factors on survival. Results: 285, 291, and 291 patients had biopsy information available for analysis, respectively. Survival analysis showed that a higher PPBC, PCV, and MIBC were each individually associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure on univariate analysis (p < 0.01). Only PPBC and PCV were associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure on multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, NCCN risk group, and dose (p < 0.01). When isolating the intermediate-risk group, only PPBC and PCV were statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of the intermediate-risk group comparing PPBC and PCV showed that PPBC was not a significant predictor of biochemical failure, while PCV was a significant predictor of biochemical failure (p = 0.37 and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: PPBC and PCV can potentially be used for additional risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients with PCV potentially being the most clinically relevant predictor bNED survival. MIBC was not found to have utility in the prognosis of low- and intermediate-risk patients.
机译:该研究的目的是比较低活度和中危患者的阳性活检核心百分比(PPBC),癌变百分比(PCV)和最大活检核心介入率(MIBC)的预后价值患有质子或光子束治疗的临床局部前列腺癌。在洛马林达大学医学中心接受质子或光子束治疗的549例临床局限性前列腺癌患者被用于该分析。患者接受了74.0 Gy(范围70.2–79.2)质子中子剂量或质子/光子束联合放射治疗。回顾了病理报告,并记录了PPBC,PCV和MIBC。使用Kaplan-Meier分析对生化分析没有疾病证据(bNED)进行评估。进行Cox回归多元分析以评估活检因子对生存的影响。结果:分别有285、291和291例患者的活检信息可供分析。生存分析表明,单因素分析显示,较高的PPBC,PCV和MIBC分别与生化衰竭风险增加相关(p <0.01)。在多变量分析,调整年龄,NCCN风险组和剂量后,只有PPBC和PCV与生化失败风险增加相关(p <0.01)。当分离出中危组时,在多变量分析中只有PPBC和PCV在统计学上是显着的。对中等风险组的PPBC和PCV进行多变量分析表明,PPBC不是生化失败的重要预测指标,而PCV是生化失败的重要预测指标(分别为p = 0.37和p = 0.03)。结论:PPBC和PCV可以潜在地用于中度风险的PCV患者的其他风险分层,这些患者可能是临床上最相关的预测bNED生存的因素。未发现MIBC可用于低危和中危患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号