首页> 外文期刊>Pathology oncology research: POR >Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ERa??/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?
【24h】

Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ERa??/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?

机译:对雌激素受体阴性/孕激素受体阳性(ERa ?? / PR +)乳腺癌表型的重新评估:真正的亚型还是技术假象?

获取原文
           

摘要

Expression of the ER and PR receptors is routinely quantified in breast cancer as a predictive marker of response to hormonal therapy. Accurate determination of ER and PR status is critical to the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy. The existence of an ERa??/PR+ subtype is controversial, with debate centred on whether this represents a true phenotype or a technical artefact on immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of this study was to investigate the true incidence and clinico-pathological features of ERa??/PR+ breast cancers in a tertiary referral symptomatic breast unit. Clinico-pathological data were collected on invasive breast cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2005. IHC for ER and PR receptors was repeated on all cases which were ERa??/PR+, with the same paraffin block used for the initial diagnostic testing. Concordance between the diagnostic and repeat IHC was determined using validated testing. Complete data, including ER and PR status were available for 697 patients diagnosed during the study period. On diagnostic IHC, the immunophenotype of the breast tumours was: ER+/PR+ in 396 (57%), ERa??/PR- in 157 (23%), ER+/PR- in 88 (12%) and ERa??/PR+ in 56 (8.6%) patients. On repeat IHC of 48/56 ERa??/PR+ tumours 45.8% were ER+/PR+, 6% were ER+/PR- and 43.7% were ERa??/PR- None of the cases were confirmed to be ERa??/PR+. The ERa??/PR+ phenotypic breast cancer is likely to be the result of technical artefact. Prompt reassessment of patients originally assigned to this subtype who re-present with symptoms should be considered to ensure appropriate clinical management.
机译:ER和PR受体的表达通常在乳腺癌中进行定量,作为对激素治疗反应的预测指标。 ER和PR状态的准确确定对于针对目标治疗的患者最佳选择至关重要。 ERaβ/ PR +亚型的存在是有争议的,争论集中在这是代表一种真正的表型还是免疫组织化学(IHC)的技术假象。这项研究的目的是调查在三级转诊有症状乳房单元中ERaβ/ PR +乳腺癌的真实发病率和临床病理特征。收集了1995年至2005年间诊断出的浸润性乳腺癌的临床病理数据。在所有ERaβ/ PR +病例中均重复了ER和PR受体的IHC,并且石蜡阻滞用于初始诊断测试。诊断和重复IHC之间的一致性是通过经过验证的测试确定的。在研究期间,可为697名患者提供包括ER和PR状态在内的完整数据。在诊断性IHC上,乳腺肿瘤的免疫表型为:ER + / PR + 396(57%),ERαβ/ PR- 157(23%),ER + / PR- 88(12%)和ERaβ/ 56名患者(8.6%)的PR +。在48/56ERaβ/ PR +肿瘤的重复IHC中,ER + / PR +为45.8%,ER + / PR-为6%,ERaβ/ PR-为43.7%,均未证实为ERaβ/ PR +。 。 ERaβ/ PR +表型乳腺癌可能是技术伪像的结果。应考虑对原先分配给该亚型且表现出症状的患者进行及时的重新评估,以确保适当的临床治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号