...
首页> 外文期刊>Taiwanese journal of obstetrics and gynecology >Safety of uterine fundal pressure maneuver during second stage of labor in a tertiary perinatal medical center: A retrospective observational study
【24h】

Safety of uterine fundal pressure maneuver during second stage of labor in a tertiary perinatal medical center: A retrospective observational study

机译:围产期三级医疗中心分娩第二阶段子宫底压力操作的安全性:一项回顾性观察研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the conformity of the indications and implementation status of uterine fundal pressure maneuver (UPFM) and to examine its safety according to the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) guidelines.Materials and methodsWe selected all the patients (n?=?265) who were treated with UFPM between January 2015 and March 2017. We first evaluated the conformity of the indications and implementation status of UFPM concerning the guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan, 2017. Second, we retrospectively examined maternal and fetal adverse events (AEs) to determine the safety of UFPM.ResultsIn total, 265 patients underwent UFPM; of all the UFPM-assisted deliveries, 189 patients (72%) were evaluated for conformity. Of these 189 patients, 181 (95.7%) were confirmed to be compliant. Laceration of the birth canal was the most frequently occurring maternal AE, followed by cervical laceration. No cases of uterine rupture, severe AEs leading to an extended hospital stay, and maternal deaths were observed. Although fetal AEs requiring admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were recorded for 33 patients (12.5%), all newborns developed normally without sequela.ConclusionThe findings of this study may support the validity of the 2017 guidelines. Because it is difficult to find evidence of the safety of use of UFPM, it is essential to accumulate experiences and results learned in clinical practice to build a consensus in the future using the current 2017 guidelines as a standard as done in the current study.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估子宫底压手术(UPFM)的适应症和实施状态的符合性,并根据日本妇产科协会(JSOG)指南检查其安全性。材料和方法我们选择了所有患者(n? =?265)在2015年1月至2017年3月期间接受UFPM治疗。我们首先评估了UFPM的适应症和实施状况与2017年日本产科实践指南的符合性。其次,我们回顾性检查了母婴不良事件结果确定总共有265例患者接受了UFPM治疗。在所有UFPM辅助分娩中,对189例患者(72%)进行了符合性评估。在这189例患者中,有181例(95.7%)被证实符合标准。产道撕裂是最常见的母体AE,其次是宫颈撕裂。没有观察到子宫破裂,严重不良事件导致住院时间延长和产妇死亡的病例。尽管有33名患者(12.5%)记录了需要入院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的胎儿AE,但所有新生儿均正常发育而没有后遗症。结论本研究的结果可能支持2017年指南的有效性。由于很难找到使用UFPM的安全性证据,因此必须积累临床实践中获得的经验和结果,以便在将来使用当前2017年指南作为本研究中的标准在未来建立共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号