首页> 外文期刊>Psychology research and behavior management >Group size and composition of work groups as precursors of intragroup conflicts
【24h】

Group size and composition of work groups as precursors of intragroup conflicts

机译:小组规模和工作小组的组成是小组内部冲突的前兆

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: This study explores the connections between formal quantitative group characteristics (such as group size, group composition by gender, age, and duration of group membership of individual workers, their average age, and duration of membership) with three levels of conflict (ie, interpersonal, individual–group, and individual–subgroup) of two types (ie, activity-oriented and subject-oriented). Method: Forty-one work groups – small-size enterprises and basic-level teams and units in medium-size companies and large corporations, with the total sample of 334 individual workers – took part in the study. The study employed the questionnaire of interpersonal conflicts in a group and the questionnaire of individual–group and micro-group conflicts as assessment tools. Subsequent regression analyses explored the relationships between group size and composition on one hand and types and levels of conflict on the other. Results: The study established that group size is negatively associated with the individual–subgroup subject-oriented conflict. Also, group size moderates the connections between several formal group characteristics and conflict types and levels. These connections are detected in large-size groups but are nearly nonexistent in small-size groups. Group diversity by gender is negatively associated with the individual–group activity-oriented conflict (across all participating groups) and with the interpersonal and individual–group subject-oriented conflicts (in large-size groups only). Group composition by duration of group membership is negatively associated with the individual–subgroup subject-oriented conflict (across groups), participants’ average age and duration of group membership – with both types of the individual–subgroup conflict. Out of all group characteristics under consideration, only group composition by age was not associated with either of the conflict parameters. Discussion: The paper makes a special point out of the fact that group characteristics served as much stronger predictors for conflict parameters in large-size groups than either in small-size groups or in the entire sample, indicating that the increase in group size strengthens the influence of group characteristics on conflict parameters. Conclusion: The research findings indicate that it is important, when studying connections between group composition and conflicts within the group, to take group size and its influence on types and levels of the intragroup conflict into account.
机译:目的:本研究探讨三种形式的冲突(即小组人数,小组组成,性别,年龄,单个工人的小组成员身份的持续时间,其平均年龄和成员身份的持续时间)之间的正式定量群体特征之间的联系。 ,人际交往,个人-小组和个人-小组)两种类型(即面向活动和面向主题)。方法:参加研究的有41个工作组-小型企业,中型公司和大型公司的基层团队和单位,总共有334名个体工人。该研究采用了一个小组中的人际冲突问卷,以及个人-小组冲突和微观小组冲突的问卷作为评估工具。随后的回归分析一方面探讨了团体规模和组成,另一方面探讨了冲突的类型和水平之间的关系。结果:该研究确定,小组规模与个人-亚小组主题导向的冲突负相关。同样,小组规模可以缓和几个正式小组特征与冲突类型和级别之间的联系。在大型组中检测到这些连接,但在小型组中几乎不存在。按性别划分的群体多样性与个人-针对活动的冲突(在所有参与组中)和人际及个人-针对主题的冲突(仅在大型团体中)负相关。按组成员身份的持续时间进行的组组成与个人-亚组面向主题的冲突(跨组),参与者的平均年龄和组成员的持续时间-两种类型的个人-亚组冲突均呈负相关。在考虑的所有小组特征中,只有按年龄分组的小组与任何冲突参数都不相关。讨论:本文特别指出以下事实:相比于小规模群体或整个样本,群体特征在大型群体中可作为更强的冲突参数预测指标,表明群体规模的增加会增强群体的冲突参数。群体特征对冲突参数的影响。结论:研究结果表明,在研究群体组成与群体内部冲突之间的联系时,重要的是要考虑群体规模及其对群体内部冲突类型和程度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号