...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology >What Reasons Might the Other One Have?—Perspective Taking to Reduce Psychological Reactance in Individualists and Collectivists
【24h】

What Reasons Might the Other One Have?—Perspective Taking to Reduce Psychological Reactance in Individualists and Collectivists

机译:另一个人可能有什么原因?-减少个人主义者和集体主义者的心理反应的角度考虑

获取原文

摘要

Previous research has demonstrated a considerable amount of negative consequences resulting from psychological reactance. The purpose of this study was to explore opportunities to reduce the amount of reactance. Using the method of perspective taking as an intervention, the current study of 196 Austrians and 198 Filipinos examined whether reactance could be reduced and whether individualists and collectivists differ concerning reactance and their perspective taking abilities. Our results indicated that participants who took the perspective of the person who threatened them experienced less reactance than participants who did not take this approach. This was the case for people from both cultural backgrounds. Nevertheless, comparisons among the two cultural groups yielded different reactions to restrictions. This indicates that individualists are more sensitive to a self-experienced restriction than collectivists, but less sensitive to a restriction of another person. Consequently, we consider culture to be a crucial determinant in predicting the amount of reactance.
机译:先前的研究表明,心理反应会导致相当多的负面后果。这项研究的目的是探索减少电抗量的机会。通过对观点的研究作为干预手段,当前对196名奥地利人和198名菲律宾人的研究调查了是否可以减少电抗,以及个人主义者和集体主义者在电抗及其观点接受能力方面是否有所不同。我们的结果表明,与没有采取这种方法的参与者相比,采取以威胁者为视角的参与者的反感程度要小。两种文化背景的人都是如此。然而,两个文化群体之间的比较对限制产生了不同的反应。这表明个人主义者比集体主义者对自我体验的限制更为敏感,但对他人限制的敏感性较低。因此,我们认为文化是预测电抗量的关键决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号