首页> 外文期刊>Psychology >Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Transactional Analysis, Existential, Cognitive, and Integrated Group Therapies on Improving Problem-Solving Skills
【24h】

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Transactional Analysis, Existential, Cognitive, and Integrated Group Therapies on Improving Problem-Solving Skills

机译:事务分析,存在,认知和综合小组疗法对提高解决问题能力的效果比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Problem-solving is one of the necessities of life in twenty first century. Therefore, Psychologists consider it as a skill that everyone must learn it. The purpose of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of the transactional analysis, existential, cognitive, and integrated group therapies on improving problem–solving skills. For this purpose, 65 subjects of the clients who were referring to the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad's Mental Health Centre were selected randomly and subjects placed in 5 groups in random assignment method (13 participants in each group). The research method is Pre-test/Post-test control group design. To gather the data, Long & Cassidy’s problem solving styles questionnaire (1996) was used. In the descriptive level, the data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, and in the inferential level Analysis of Covariance test (ANCOVA) was used. The results of data analysis were indicative of the fact that after modifying pretest scores, there was a significant difference between group’s subjects. The results showed that group therapies were effective on improving problem-solving skills and that cognitive and integrated group therapies were more effective on improving problem-solving skills comparing to other groups. Regarding the results of the present study, it can be concluded that transactional analysis, existential, cognitive and integrated group therapies were effective on improving problem-solving skills of the clients who were referring to the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad's Mental Health Centre.
机译:解决问题是二十世纪生活的必需品之一。因此,心理学家认为它是每个人都必须学习的技能。本研究的目的是比较事务分析,存在性,认知和综合团体疗法对提高解决问题能力的有效性。为此,随机选择了马什哈德费尔多西大学精神卫生中心的客户65名受试者,并以随机分配方法将其分为5组(每组13名参与者)。研究方法是测试前/测试后的对照组设计。为了收集数据,我们使用了Long&Cassidy的问题解决风格调查表(1996)。在描述级别,使用均值和标准差分析数据,在推断级别,使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析。数据分析的结果表明以下事实:修改预测分数后,组的受试者之间存在显着差异。结果表明,与其他小组相比,小组疗法对提高解决问题的能力有效,而认知和综合小组疗法对提高解决问题的能力更有效。关于本研究的结果,可以得出结论,交易分析,存在性,认知和综合团体疗法对提高指称马什哈德费多西大学心理健康中心的客户的问题解决能力有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号