...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports >Physical and Physiological Responses during the Stop-Ball Rule During Small-Sided Games in Soccer Players
【24h】

Physical and Physiological Responses during the Stop-Ball Rule During Small-Sided Games in Soccer Players

机译:足球运动员小游戏中停球规则中的生理和生理反应

获取原文
           

摘要

Small-sided games (SSGs) are a recommended training method for significant performance enhancement, and training efficiency. The stop-ball (SSG-SB) effects on physical responses (e.g., acceleration, deceleration, sprints, total distance, and indicator of workload) have not been investigated yet. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the SSG-SB compared to the small-goals SSG (SSG-SG) on physical and heart rate (HR) responses at high intensity (total distance (18 km/h)), sprints (18 km/h), and acceleration and deceleration (3 m/s2) during a 4 vs. 4 SSG format in youth professional soccer players. Sixteen male elite young soccer players (mean ± SD body height, 176.5 ± 6.3 cm; age, 18.3 ± 0.7 years; body weight, 73.4 ± 7.2 kg) performed two forms of SSGs, i.e., SSG-SB or SSG-SG, for 4 × 4 min with a recovery of 2 min between sets. Data were compared using the t -test. The SSG-SB induced a significantly higher mean HR (180.0 ± 2.0 vs. 173.0 ± 3.0 beats per minute; p 0.05) compared to the SSG-SG. Likewise, the SSG-SB was significantly higher compared to the SSG-SG for total distance (2580 ± 220.3 vs. 2230 ± 210 m; p 0.001), player load (98.07 ± 12.5 vs. 89.4 ± 10.5; p 0.05), sprint distance (7.9 ± 2.3 vs. 5.2 ± 2.0 m; p 0.05), acceleration (15.6 ± 2.75 vs. 12.5 ± 1.75; p 0.05), and deceleration (17.3 ± 3.20 vs. 14.4 ± 2.55; p 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the SSG-SG and the SSG-SB for maximal velocity, power, and sprints duration. This study provides new information about the effectiveness of the SSG-SB as a training stimulus for soccer.
机译:建议使用小面游戏(SSG),以显着提高性能并提高训练效率。尚未研究停球(SSG-SB)对身体反应(例如,加速,减速,冲刺,总距离和工作量指标)的影响。这项研究旨在调查与小目标SSG(SSG-SG)相比,SSG-SB对高强度(总距离(> 18 km / h)),短跑(Sprint)的身体和心率(HR)反应的影响> 18 km / h),以及青年专业足球运动员在4 vs. 4 SSG格式下的加减速(> 3 m / s2)。 16名男性精英年轻足球运动员(平均±SD身高,176.5±6.3 cm;年龄,18.3±0.7岁;体重,73.4±7.2 kg)进行了两种形式的SSG,即SSG-SB或SSG-SG 4×4分钟,每组之间恢复2分钟。使用t检验比较数据。与SSG-SG相比,SSG-SB诱导的平均HR明显更高(180.0±2.0 vs. 173.0±3.0节拍/分钟; p <0.05)。同样,SSG-SB的总距离(2580±220.3 vs.2230±210 m; p <0.001),玩家负荷(98.07±12.5 vs. 89.4±10.5; p <0.05)显着高于SSG-SG ,冲刺距离(7.9±2.3 vs. 5.2±2.0 m; p <0.05),加速度(15.6±2.75 vs. 12.5±1.75; p <0.05)和减速度(17.3±3.20 vs. 14.4±2.55; p <0.05 )。但是,对于最大速度,功率和冲刺持续时间,SSG-SG和SSG-SB之间没有发现显着差异。这项研究提供了有关SSG-SB作为足球训练刺激效果的新信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号