首页> 外文期刊>Practical Applications >Bridging the Gap: Adding Factors to Passive and Active Allocations
【24h】

Bridging the Gap: Adding Factors to Passive and Active Allocations

机译:缩小差距:增加被动分配和主动分配的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Bridging the Gap: Adding Factors to Passive and Active Allocations, which appeared in the 2018 Quantitative Special Issue of The Journal of Portfolio Management, Anil Rao, Raman Aylur Subramanian, and Dimtiris Melas (all of MSCI, Inc.) argue that asset owners should use risk budgeting to determine the optimal mix of active and passive investments. To support this assertion, the authors examine the effects of different possible active, passive, and factor (top-down or bottom-up) allocations when the active managers have high tracking errors. The authors also examine the effects of using a minimum-volatility strategy to de-risk the equity program. Ultimately, they found that the optimal allocations were around 40% passive, 30-40% active, and 20-30% factor allocation, with differences in funding source and risk allocation.
机译:在《弥合差距:增加被动和主动分配的因素》一书中,该文章刊登在2018年《证券投资管理杂志》定量特刊中,Anil Rao,Raman Aylur Subramanian和Dimtiris Melas(所有MSCI,Inc.)都认为资产所有者应该使用风险预算来确定主动和被动投资的最佳组合。为了支持这一主张,作者研究了当主动管理者具有较高的跟踪误差时,不同的可能的主动,被动和因素(自上而下或自下而上)分配的影响。作者还研究了使用最小波动率策略降低股权计划风险的影响。最终,他们发现最优分配约为被动分配40%,主动分配30-40%和要素分配20-30%,资金来源和风险分配有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号