Peak flow meter with a questionnaire and mini-spirometer to help detect asthma and COPD in real-life clinical practice: a cross-sectional study

摘要

Peak flow meter with questionnaire and mini-spirometer are considered as alternative tools to spirometry for screening of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the accuracy of these tools together, in clinical settings for disease diagnosis, has not been studied. Two hundred consecutive patients with respiratory complaints answered a short symptom questionnaire and performed peak expiratory flow measurements, standard spirometry with Koko spirometer and mini-spirometry (COPD-6). Spirometry was repeated after bronchodilation. Physician made a final diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and others. One eighty nine patients (78 females) with age 51鈥壜扁€?7 years with asthma (115), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (33) and others (41) completed the study. 鈥淏reathlessness鈥?鈥?months鈥?and 鈥渃ough鈥?鈥?months鈥?were important symptoms to detect obstructive airways disease. 鈥淎symptomatic period鈥?鈥? weeks鈥?had the best sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) to differentiate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A peak expiratory flow of鈥?鈥?0% predicted was the best cut-off to detect airflow limitation (Sn 90%, Sp 50%). Respiratory symptoms with PEF鈥?鈥?0% predicted, had Sn 84 and Sp 93% to detect OAD. COPD-6 device under-estimated FEV1 by 13鈥塵L (95% CI: 鈭?12, 185). At a cut-off of 0.75, the FEV1/FEV6 had the best accuracy (Sn 80%, Sp 86%) to detect airflow limitation. Peak flow meter with few symptom questions can be effectively used in clinical practice for objective detection of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in the absence of good quality spirometry. Mini-spirometers are useful in detection of obstructive airways diseases but FEV1 measured is inaccurate.