首页> 外文期刊>Practical Laboratory Medicine >Plasma lactate measurement as an example of encountered gaps between routine clinical laboratory processes and manufactures' sample-handling instructions
【24h】

Plasma lactate measurement as an example of encountered gaps between routine clinical laboratory processes and manufactures' sample-handling instructions

机译:血浆乳酸的测量,作为常规临床实验室过程和制造商的样品处理说明之间遇到的差距的一个示例

获取原文
       

摘要

ObjectivesDeviation from manufacturers’ pre-analytical sample handling recommendations necessitates extensive validation studies. This report uses plasma lactate testing, where a recommended 15?min room temperature sample handling limit cannot be met by the clinical laboratory, as an example for studies to bridge the gap with practice.Design and MethodsTriplicate blood samples were collected from patients (n?=?51) with lactate requests by clinicians and from normal volunteers (n?=?50). One tube was transported on ice (4?°C), the others were maintained at room temperature (23?°C). Tubes stored at 4?°C were processed at 30?min from collection. Tubes stored at 23?°C were processed at 15 and at 30?min from collection. Lactate levels were measured using Roche Diagnostics Cobas 6000? analyzer.ResultsLactate levels in normal subjects ranged from 0.6 to 3.1?mmol/L (median 1.1). Patient lactate levels ranged from 0.8 to 26.3?mmol/L (median 2.2). Bias in lactate levels following extended storage of samples from both normal subjects and patients ranged from ??1.3 to2.2 and from ??1.0–1.0?mmol/L when stored for 30?min at 23?°C or at 4?°C, respectively. The bias between lactate levels at 30?min at 23?°C and 4?°C was ??1.2 to ??0.5?mmol/L for both populations. Although the bias was not statistically significant for all variables, a clinically significant (>0.2?mmol/L) bias was observed in 28% of normal and 7.0% of patient samples.ConclusionExtending the pre-analytical time to 30?min at 23?°C did not significantly impact clinical utility of lactate measurement in our patient population.
机译:目标偏离制造商的分析前样品处理建议,需要进行大量的验证研究。本报告使用血浆乳酸测试,临床实验室无法满足建议的15分钟最低室温样品处理极限,以此作为弥合实际与实践之间差距的研究实例。设计和方法从患者那里采集三份血液样品(n? =?51),并由临床医生和正常志愿者提出乳酸要求(n?=?50)。将一根试管在冰上(4℃)运输,将另一支保持在室温(23℃)下。储存于4℃的试管在收集后30分钟的时间内进行处理。储存于23℃的试管在收集后的15分钟和30分钟时进行处理。乳酸水平是使用Roche Diagnostics Cobas 6000?结果正常受试者中的乳酸水平为0.6至3.1?mmol / L(中位数1.1)。患者的乳酸水平范围为0.8至26.3?mmol / L(中位数2.2)。在23°C或4°C下保存30分钟后,正常受试者和患者的样品长期保存后,乳酸水平的偏差范围为1.31.3至2.2和1.01.0-1.0?mmol / L。 C分别。两种人群在30?min在23?C和4?C时乳酸水平之间的偏差为?? 1.2至?? 0.5?mmol / L。尽管该偏倚在所有变量上均无统计学意义,但在28%的正常样本和7.0%的患者样本中观察到临床上的偏倚(> 0.2?mmol / L)。结论将分析前时间延长至23?30分钟。 °C对我们的患者人群中乳酸测量的临床效用没有显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号