...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Engineering >ON THE CHOICE OF RANDOM WAVE SIMULATION IN THE SURF ZONE PROCESSES
【24h】

ON THE CHOICE OF RANDOM WAVE SIMULATION IN THE SURF ZONE PROCESSES

机译:冲浪带过程中随机波模拟的选择

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper, the two common approaches to account for wave randomness, the spectral approach and the wave-by-wave approach, are compared through numerical experiments conducted with the coupling of a surf zone hydrodynamic model and a bedload sediment transport model. Special attention is paid to the wave nonlinearity and net cross-shore bedload transport predictions. The two approaches are found to have negligible difference in their predictions of certain average hydrodynamics, such as wave heights, set-up and undertow. However, the wave-by-wave approach outperforms the spectral approach in the wave nonlinearity prediction, and the two approaches differ significantly in their predictions of wave-induced net cross-shore bedload transport which strongly depends on wave nonlinearity. This suggests the necessity of using the wave-by-wave approach. The computational efficiency of the wave-by-wave approach is also discussed.
机译:在本文中,通过结合海浪区水动力模型和基床输沙模型进行的数值实验,比较了两种常见的解释波浪随机性的方法,即频谱方法和逐波方法。特别要注意波浪的非线性和跨岸净荷重预测。发现这两种方法在预测某些平均流体动力学方面的差异可以忽略不计,例如波浪高度,起伏和下沉。然而,在波浪非线性预测中,逐波方法优于频谱方法,并且这两种方法在对波浪引起的净跨岸基床输运量的预测中存在显着差异,而后者主要取决于波浪的非线性。这表明使用逐波方法的必要性。还讨论了逐波方法的计算效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号