首页> 外文期刊>Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology >?Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
【24h】

?Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein

机译:弗雷格的难题解散了吗?对霍华德·韦特斯坦的三个异议

获取原文
       

摘要

In this paper I focus my attention on the proposal given by Howard Wettstein in 1980 to the cognitive phenomenon stated by Gottlob Frege in his paper “On sense and reference”. I offer three arguments in order to show that his answer does not weaken this phenomenon. Particularly, I defend three ideas: first, it is legitimate that philosophical semantics, in contrast with what Wettstein defends, provides an answer to the cognitive phenomenon; second, Wettstein does not conceive Frege’s argument correctly by considering it generates a semantic theory from a purely mentalist phenomenon; third, the explanation supplied by Wettstein is assumed by Frege when he states the phenomenon.
机译:在本文中,我将注意力集中在霍华德·韦特施泰因(Howard Wettstein)在1980年对Gottlob Frege在其论文“关于感官和参照”中提出的认知现象的建议上。我提供三个论点,以表明他的回答不会削弱这一现象。特别是,我捍卫了三个观点:首先,与韦特斯坦主张的相反,哲学语义学为认知现象提供了答案是合情合理的;其二。其次,韦特斯坦没有考虑到弗雷格的论点是从纯粹的心理主义现象中产生了一种语义理论,从而不能正确地理解弗雷格的论点。第三,韦特斯坦提供的解释是弗雷格在陈述这种现象时所假定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号